Swan Housing Association – Written evidence (OMC0076)

 

Our Offsite Manufacturing Experience:

 

Swan Housing Association is leading the way in the use of off-site construction in the Housing Association sector. We have invested £3 million in our own factory in Basildon, Essex which uses Cross Laminated Timber to build modular homes which are delivered to site fully fitted out, before being installed, the exterior walls and roof added. We have already delivered our first modular show homes to site and are now marketing our first shared ownership and private sale modular homes. Our factory will be able to produce up to 500 homes a year.

 

Our “NU build system” won the “Best Approach to Modular Construction” at the Inside Housing Development Awards 2017. The judges noted that we had been able to fund the factory set up and running costs through our £130m regeneration of Craylands; the creation of local jobs; and the delivery of high quality homes in 50% of traditional construction times, with 90% savings on waste and initially 10% cost savings, with further savings expected as efficiencies increase.

 

We have significant construction experience having already completed over 1,200 starts on site throughout our own in-house construction company NU living using traditional construction methods. We’ve built over 900 homes to date generating over £60m which has been reinvested in affordable homes and services for our residents.

 

About Swan:

 

Formed in 1994, Swan Housing Association has been providing high-quality and affordable homes to rent and buy for over 20 years. Today, Swan locally manages over 11,000 homes in Essex and East London, specifically in Tower Hamlets, Newham, Barking and Dagenham, Redbridge and Havering; supported by dedicated, local staff. We were awarded Housing Association of the Year at the WhatHouse? 2017 Awards for our approach, including our innovative offsite construction project.

 

We have built-up a specialism in large-scale regeneration schemes, such as £300m Blackwall Reach in Tower Hamlets and Laindon Shopping Centre in Essex. The former will see the existing 252 Robin Hood Gardens properties replaced by over 1,500 homes during the next decade and has already won the ‘Award for Planning for Housing Growth’ at the Planning Awards 2015. The latter will use modular construction to build a new town centre and the designs for this scheme have already won national and international recognition as set out in our response below.

 

Our social purpose: “delivering homes and services to those who need them” underpins everything we do and that is why we focus on large scale regeneration as we can build mixed tenure sustainable communities, where homes for private sale and commercial uses subsidise the provision of affordable homes. Our corporate strategy challenges us to generate £250m this way by 2027 to reinvest in homes and services.

 

Swan is committed to helping the Government achieve its house-building objectives and our ambitious corporate strategy targets us to build an additional 10,000 homes by 2027. Our secured development pipeline of over 6,500 homes includes the £1bn regeneration of Purfleet on Thames which will deliver up 2,850 homes along with a new town centre for Purfleet as well as one million square feet of film studios and even a new university campus for a leading London University.

 

With the Committee looking specifically at “The Perceived advantages of offsite manufacture for construction, Swan would like to share its experience with the Committee to aid its timely and important inquiry.

 

Perceived advantages of offsite manufacture for construction

 

1. What are the opportunities offered by offsite manufacture for construction? What are the likely drawbacks? What factors are likely to influence clients, architects, design engineers, contractors and the supply chain in deciding whether to choose offsite manufacture?

 

What are the opportunities offered by offsite manufacture for construction?

 

For Swan the key opportunities offered by offsite manufacture are:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

image001

 

 

What influenced Swan to pursue an off-site construction approach?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. It is often claimed that offsite manufacture can lead to:
• lower costs, faster delivery and increased quality;
• increased productivity;
• improved health and safety;
• greater provision of new, affordable housing.
 

What is the evidence for this?

 

 

 

increase productivity: Now that we have established our “NU build System” and set up our production line on our factory, the move into full production will see us deliver 10 homes a week.

 

Maintain and enhance health and safety: As a traditional contractor we have a clear focus on ensuring the highest standards of health and safety on all our sites. The factory however, presents an opportunity to have a very controlled production environment with all tasks clearly documented and carried out in a clean, dry factory environment with clear visibility of all works. The use of significant cutting and lifting machinery does need to be properly managed but again, this is happening in a stable, controlled environment.

 

Be able to deliver greater provision of new, affordable housing: We are using our factory, which was viable at 100 homes, to deliver far more at up to 500 homes. These homes will be used to provide both private sale and affordable homes at the regenerations set out below. However, the Committee should note that even where private sale homes are provided, because of our business model, with all profits being invested in either new affordable homes or services for our residents, these private sale homes will subsidise further affordable homes including homes for social rent as well as shared ownership helping us deliver our 6,500-home secured development programme making schemes more viable through the benefits outlined above:

 

 

3. What are the drawbacks to offsite manufacture for construction?

 

Our experience of opening our factory have highlighted the following challenges to successful production, although these are not necessarily “drawbacks as we have been able to overcome them:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the future:

 

 

 

 

4. What re-skilling of the construction workforce is required to facilitate a change to more off-site manufacture for construction?

 

It is our experience that whilst specialist manufacturing experts are required to ensure a precision manufactured approach can be applied to production, the construction of the modules requires skilled multi-trades construction tradespeople, the majority of whom we have found are easily able to adapt to working in the factory environment. We are working with PROCAT to develop the first modular construction apprenticeships at our factory. We also have been partnering with Essex County Council as they recognise that modular construction will be a key construction method of the future and want to ensure that there are training young people to have the appropriate skills to work in this sector.

 

5. Can the benefits of standardisation and factory manufacture be realised without hampering architectural ambition? If so, how?

 

 

 

P:\COMMUNICATIONS\IMAGES - VIDEOS - MUSIC\PHOTOS\ESTATE PHOTOS\LAINDON CENTRE\CF Moller photos 10.5.2017\Block N - Landscaped Space.jpg

 

 

The NHA judges said about Laindon “A great scheme that is both regenerative and visionary and brings together residential and commercial uses to create a new heart for the town.

 

 

6. What R&D is needed, and by whom, to realise fully the potential benefits of off-site manufacture?

Systems need to be mortgageable and acceptable to our lenders in terms of charging as we rely on borrowing against completed homes to fund our future developments. Some funders are cautious about accepting too many modular homes as security as it is a relatively new product. Further guidance and R&D to support this would be useful. We have already achieved BOPAS (Build Off-site Property Assurance Scheme) accreditation which entails an independent assurance that our modular homes will last a minimum of 60 years, and our developments will come with a 12-year warranty in line with traditional construction but further guidance for lenders would help accelerate adoption of this approach.

 

7. (If published) does the construction sector deal correctly identify the issues faced by the construction industry and the actions that the Government and other stakeholders need to take to address them? What should it contain/what is missing?

 

8. What changes could be made to public procurement processes to encourage more economically and environmentally sustainable practises in the construction industry and facilitate off-site manufacture?

 

Central and local government can help to accelerate the development of more off-site manufacturing facilities. They can set clear targets for the adoption of off-site manufacture on sites that they own, they can incentivise councils and housing associations to build affordable housing using these techniques through prioritising grant funding for such projects, and they can encourage the sharing of knowledge and best practice.

 

4 May 2018