Written evidence submitted by Asylum Seeker Housing Project
Asylum Accommodation and Support Services In Scotland
UKVI Dispersal Policy
Based on the most up to date available figures, there are currently 34,367 asylum seekers in dispersed accommodation in the UK
https://www.refugeecouncil.org.uk/assets/0003/8736/Asylum_Statistics_August_2016.pdf
The projected number of asylum seekers per region is detailed below.
Region | Percentage Allocation | No of asylum seekers per region |
London And South East | 32% | 10,997 |
Midlands and East England | 16% | 5,498 |
Wales and South West | 8% | 2,749 |
NE and Yorkshire and Humberside | 20% | 6,873 |
North West | 16% | 5,498 |
Scotland and Northern Ireland | 8% | 2,749 |
As mentioned previously, the current number of asylum seekers accommodated in Scotland is 4000 service users equating to 11.6% of the total number of asylum seekers in the UK
UKVI COMPASS Contractual Payments To Serco/Orchard & Shipman
The Contract is for an initial 5 year period terminating in December 2017 with an option of a two year extension
Summary of Possible Contractual Failures and Illegal Practices
The extremely poor standard of housing provided by the current asylum accommodation provider is well documented and can be summarised as follows;
There has also been growing concern by refugee agencies that many of the working practices of the provider are illegal and these are summarised below
All asylum seekers are issued with an occupancy agreement (Annex 1- occupancy agreement). Based on this document, it is our understanding that the legal obligations of the tenant and landlord are governed by common law tenancy rights.
Serco’s Policy on evicting tenant’s states;
“Orchard and Shipman will follow due legal process to evict the service user” ( Annex 2 - Serco SOP 9.4 Negative Decision SNI).
The Policy also confirms that where a service user has refused to vacate a property, Orchard and Shipman will “begin legal proceedings to secure an eviction order”.
To date, no notice of proceedings has been raised against any service user. Instead, residents are either bullied or intimidated out of properties or their locks are changed when they are not home.
Examples of such practices have regularly been highlighted in the media and can be accessed via the links below;
http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/13290813.Asylum_seekers_locked_out_of_homes/
http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/13294713.Pregnancy_won_t_halt_eviction/
http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/13279317.George_fears_eviction_will_kill_him/
Possible Legislative Breaches
In accordance with S22(3) asylum support regulations 2000, the provider currently issues a 7 day notice period of termination of accommodation
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2000/704/part/9/made
It is our understanding that all common law tenancies require a 28 day - 40 day notice period
In addition, no repossession proceedings are being raised against service users who have not been intimidated out of their homes. Instead, locks are changed.
As a result of the accommodation provider’s policy of changing locks in order to evict residents, their belongings are often still in the property.
ASH is aware of several cases where evicted service users have requested their belongings back only to be either “fobbed off” for months on end or to be told there was nothing left by them in the flat. We strongly suspect that the provider is simply disposing of all personal belong as this is logistically the simplest way for them to have flats ready for new residents.
Possible Legislative Breaches
The Home Office asylum policy bulletin states;
“Q62 What happens to possessions when a asylum seeker has absconded, been evicted, imprisoned or has died?”
“In these circumstances it is considered best practice for accommodation providers to adopt procedures which comply with the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977, unless the terms of the occupancy agreement allow the provider to dispose of anything left behind without liability.
Under the Torts Act a landlord becomes an ‘involuntary bailee’. This effectively means that although the abandoned possessions remain the property of the asylum seeker, the landlord assumes responsibility for them.
The landlord is obliged to make every effort to contact the owner warning him/her that the property may be disposed of within a certain time unless it is collected. This is often a couple of weeks. If the landlord receives no communication from the owner he is at liberty to dispose of or sell the possessions, but is obliged to keep any proceeds from a sale for a certain length of time in case the person returns. The landlord is permitted to be reimbursed for any costs incurred from the proceeds of the sale.”
(Home Office Asylum support: policy bulletins instructions April 2015 p70)
It is our understanding that a failure comply with the Torts (Interference with goods) Act 1977 may lead to the provider being liable to prosecution for theft.
It is current practice for the provider to accommodate 2 single parent families in one self-contained flat. ASH is aware of instances where;
It is also common practice by the provider to classify small bedrooms as “doubles” and allocate them accordingly.
Possible Legislative Breaches
We believe that the current practices of the provider leads to overcrowding and contravenes Section 136(the room standard) and Section 137 (the space standard) of Part V11 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987.
ASH is aware that the provider is entering flats by without providing any notice to residents
Possible legislative breaches
We believe that this practice contravenes The Housing Scotland Act 1988 and the Housing (Scotland) 1987, Schedule 10 which requires a landlord to give 24 hours advance notice in writing of their intentions to enter a property.
In addition, we feel unannounced entry into a residents' accommodation is also contrary to the principles of article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998, "Right to respect for private life and the home.
ASH has attempted to highlight these possible breaches of UK and Scottish legislation directly, in writing, to the provider. Their approach to date is simply not to respond, or to deny that they are acting illegally.
Given the seriousness of these practices, we feel there is no other available option but to consider legal action and have been working with the Govan Law Centre’s Public Interest Litigation Unit.
Sheila Arthur
Asylum Seeker Housing Project
Between Orchard & Shipman
and
_________________________________________________ (‘the Occupant’)
This Occupancy Agreement sets out the terms on which the Occupant occupies the property (‘the property’) leased by Orchard & Shipman as part of its contract with the SERCO and the UK Border Agency and the duties and obligations of Orchard & Shipman and the Occupant. This property is for temporary accommodation only.
1.1 To make the property available to the Occupant, on a temporary basis, on behalf of the UK Border Agency, whilst his/her asylum application is being assessed.
1.2 That this Occupancy Agreement shall commence
on …………………………………………(regardless of the date of signing this Agreement).
1.3 To ensure that at the commencement, and throughout the period, of occupancy the property is structurally sound, is in a wind and watertight condition, and is in a reasonable state of repair and maintenance.
1.4 To provide a day-to-day housing management service to deal with and resolve any issues arising from the accommodation. Any issues relating to the property may be discussed with or reported to a Housing Officer.
1.5 To provide furniture and utensils for use within the property which are detailed on the attached schedule. The furniture and utensils remain the property of Orchard & Shipman at all times and must not be removed from the property. Any loss or damage to the furniture or utensils, arising from any misuse or neglect by the Occupant or any person living in the accommodation or any visitor, will be reported to UK Border Agency.
2.1 To occupy the property allocated by the Orchard & Shipman as his/her only home and to limit occupation solely to those of his/her dependants for whom the property was allocated. Visitors are permitted at all reasonable times, but cannot remain overnight. The occupant is responsible for the conduct of any visitors to the property who must behave in accordance with Clause 2.5 of this agreement whilst on the premises.
2.2 Not to carry out any structural, internal or external alterations, or any other repair to the property.
2.3 To report any outstanding repairs to Orchard & Shipman.
2.4 To keep, and on final departure from the property leave, all furniture and utensils provided clean and in a reasonable state of repair (fair wear and tear excepted).
2.5 Not to cause or permit any nuisance to the property, or cause or permit any fear or alarm, nuisance or annoyance, issue threats or behave in a violent manner to other residents, staff, visitors or other residents in the neighbourhood.
2.6 Not to interfere with or in any way alter the electricity supply and meters or the wiring and timing mechanisms of the heating systems in the property, or tamper with any fire or smoke detector alarm.
2.7 Not to keep any animals in the property or in any adjoining or separate land with the property.
2.8 Not to use the property for business purposes.
2.9 To allow an authorised member of Orchard & Shipman’s staff, or an approved contractor to enter the property at a prearranged time, having written to give 5 days notice, for
the purpose of inspecting the property and any furnishing and utensils provided therein,
and to allow inspection of electricity meters and electrical appliances.
To allow a Orchard & Shipman Staff, or an approved contractor to enter the property at a prearranged time, having written to give five days notice in order to carry out general maintenance.
To allow an Orchard & Shipman Staff or approved contractor to enter the property immediately in the case of an emergency, immediate or urgent maintenance needed to be carried out.
2.10 To move if required by Orchard & Shipman Staff and/or the UK Border Agency to another property considered appropriate. A minimum of seven days notice of any intended relocation will be given except in the case of the property being deemed to be unsafe.
3. Quality of Service and any Complaint
3.1 Orchard & Shipman is committed to providing a quality service in a non-discriminatory way and does not tolerate harassment, bullying or any other threatening behaviour.
The Occupant may report any incidents of this nature directly to the police service and/or to Orchard & Shipman staff.
The Occupant has the right to contact UK Border Agency directly in relation to the quality of service provided by Orchard & Shipman.
3.2 The occupant has the right to complain about the service provided by Orchard and Shipman as detailed in the complaints policy leaflet provided in your Welcome Pack
4.1 This agreement shall terminate upon the determination of the Occupant’s asylum claim, subject to service of a written notice in terms of 4.2 hereof.
4.2 Orchard and Shipman may terminate this Agreement by serving a written notice on the Occupant, specifying the date and time of, and the reason for the termination.
4.3 Any breach of paragraphs 2.5 or 2.6 or 2.7 or where there is a persistent or other substantial breach of this Occupancy Agreement which the Occupant has failed to remedy may lead to termination of this Agreement, followed by immediate application of eviction procedures.
Signed on behalf of Orchard & Shipman ______________________________(Signed)
______________________________(Date)
The terms of this Agreement are understood by me and
(a) I agree to keep to them as governing my Occupancy at:
(address) …………………………………………..……………………………………………...
Glasgow, …………….
(b) I understand the Emergency Procedures which have been explained to me. I have received a copy of the Welcome and Information Pack printed in my own language, which I shall retain for my own records.
(c) I am aware of my right to be accompanied by a person of my choice in all my dealings with Orchard & Shipman.
_____________________________(Signed)
_____________________________(Date)
Serco COMPASS Standard Operating Procedure 9.4 Move on/Negative decision/SNI |
|
|
|
| |
Owner | Anne Kinghorn |
Document details | Anne Kinghorn |
Cross ref with | SOR UKBA Guidelines doc |
Version no | SDC-OP-02 |
No of pages |
|
Date of instruction | 25 September 2012 |
|
|
Approved date |
|
Scope of Instruction |
These procedures will apply to all Serco COMPASS staff that are required to act within the terms of these Procedures, in the execution of the operational requirements of the COMPASS contract within Scotland or Northern Ireland. |
Instruction Detail |
The detailed systematic Procedures to be carried out by Serco COMPASS staff are described below. |
Risks |
The risks associated with this Procedure are that Serco COMPASS staff, in the execution of the Procedure, fails to comply with the Procedure, in part or whole. |
Review Arrangements |
Contract Manager – minimum annually or as required |
Policy
The purpose of this Local Operating procedure is to give clear instructions on the procedures to be followed In Discontinuing support for and Moving on Service Users when a Negative Decision has been received.
Taken in consideration are procedures to be followed regarding Service Users who are reluctant to vacate Accommodation when instructed.
It is assumed that O&S will receive the 21 day notification of cessation of UKBA support from Serco via the Serco COMPASS Veco IT system within one working day of the notice being posted onto the UKBA MIP. It is assumed that UKBA will post the 21 day notification on the MIP within one working day of creating the notice.
Assumptions
SDC staff have access to the MIP/CBP and have been trained in its use.
Access to the CBP/MIP is by user log on. Enquiries on CBP/MIP access should be directed to the CBP/MIP Delivery Group.
Procedure;
discontinuation notice from UKBA via CBP/MIP | |
UKBA notifies SDC of negative decision and discontinuation of support via the Portal.
| UKBA Service Delivery Centre |
UKBA simultaneously writes to the SU, informing them of the decision and giving notice date for end of support at the end of the 21 day period. Letter sent by registered post. | Service Delivery Centre Manchester |
On receipt of 21 day notification of cessation of UKBA support, Orchard and Shipman issue a Notice to Quit to the service user in accordance with Section 22(3) of the Asylum and Support Regulations 2000. The notification to be posted (First Class) or hand delivered, dependant on time available. | Orchard and Shipman |
Arrange to visit the service user the following working day to check their understanding of the termination of support date. | Orchard and Shipman |
In an appropriate language, brief Service User of the process and identify any specific circumstances and or a determination of any immediate health or other needs. Information from appropriate support agencies and organisation working with refused asylum seekers will be provided and signposting offered.
| Orchard and Shipman |
Inform Service User of options available to them and how to proceed with the options. These are:
| Orchard and Shipman |
Where a Service user is unwilling to go home or the options outlined above do not apply. Refer Service Users to:
| Orchard and Shipman |
HO visits Service User on day 16 of the notice to quit period to check that they are aware of the date to move and to ask what preparation they have made to move. (HO to use this visit to gauge the SU’s intentions ) HO offers further assistance with calls to agencies on SU’s behalf if necessary
Record Visit. | Orchard and Shipman |
HO returns to SU address on Move On date. Where the service user re-iterates that they will not engage with the agencies outlined above, Orchard and Shipman will follow due legal process to evict the service user.
| Orchard and Shipman |
UKBA/SDC notified that the SU is refusing to vacate the property. |
|
Begin legal proceedings to secure eviction order | Contract Manager Director of Housing |
Inform SDC of Move Out completion within 4 hours of move out | Housing Officer |
Update property status on MIP | Service Delivery Centre |
C
OMPASS – North W
September 2016