Written evidence submitted by

Professor John Newton, Director of Health Improvement at Public Health England and Government’s Government adviser on increasing Covid-19 testing capacity (C190034)

 

 

 

Oral evidence: Evidence behind COVID-19 testing strategy

 

Professor Doyle and I were very grateful for the opportunity to attend the Committee hearing on Friday 22 May to respond in person to your outstanding questions from previous evidence sessions and subsequent correspondence.

 

In this letter, I am providing follow up information on two questions that I was not able to answer at the time. These were in relation to: return rates for postal tests, and recovery of costs of lateral flow tests that were not required.

 

Public Health England (PHE) is not responsible for these two issues, but they were raised by the Committee and I am writing in my current role as the Government’s testing co-ordinator within the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC). This letter should therefore be read together with the separate follow up letter provided by Professor Doyle on matters relating to PHE.

 

In addition, I thought it would be helpful to provide further information on the strategy for developing laboratory capacity for coronavirus testing.

 

Return rates for postal tests

You asked about the current return rate for COVID-19 Home Test Kits. As of 23:59 on 26 May 2020, the Home Test Service dispatched 398,637 Test Kits. Of those kits dispatched, as of 23:59 on 26 May 2020, 60% have been returned and processed by our laboratory system.


The proportion of Home Test kits being returned is on an upward trajectory, and the DHSC continues to implement a range of measures to drive this rate further up. This includes (1)

Utilising the best behavioural science advice from the United Kingdom (UK) and

internationally to “nudge” and encourage users to return their kits; (2) Working with world leading medical device and ecommerce firms to understand and apply best practice from the private sector, as well as learning from experts in the charitable sector, like the Terence Higgins Trust; and (3) Continuously refining and improving the user journey to make it as simple and intuitive as possible.

 

Recovery of costs of lateral flow tests that did not meet Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) specification

DHSC has confirmed that it issued Purchase Orders totalling approximately £92m, which included DHSC’s standard conditions of purchase, including warranty. As outlined elsewhere, none of those tests ordered met the standards on specificity and sensitivity for clinical use (including by individuals at home), now set out in an MHRA specification.

However, a proportion of the tests are now being used for other purposes such as research. The value of tests being repurposed is around £3.3m.

 

Where tests are not being repurposed, to date, orders have been cancelled, with no liability to HMG, totalling c.£70m in value out of Purchase Orders representing approximately £92m. Negotiations are ongoing with other suppliers.

 

Strategy for developing testing capacity and offers from other labs

The UK’s coronavirus testing strategy has been led by the DHSC and has successfully delivered a very substantial increase in the national testing capacity and capability. PHE operates a reference laboratory for novel and dangerous pathogens and provides valuable scientific and professional advice to other laboratories.

 

It was DHSC therefore rather than PHE that took forward the work on developing the country’s mass testing capability, managed the interaction with industry and successfully created the current Pillar Two testing capacity. Since the testing programme began,

laboratory capacity has been enhanced through several different routes. For example, NHS and PHE capacity has been enhanced through a partnership with Roche. Three dedicated purpose-built laboratories have been stood up with support from Thermo Fisher. In addition, DHSC has capitalised on some of the numerous offers of support with laboratory capacity made by other institutions.

 

To consolidate work with industry and other partners on increasing laboratory capacity, Government held two roundtables in March first with Universities UK, the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, and DEFRA institutions, and then with a wider group of representatives from major research institutes, universities and government departments.

 

The Chief Scientific Officer for England (Professor Dame Sue Hill) has established a technical assessment and validation team, and developed a detailed checklist and quality framework, to enable an assessment of the quality and operational capability of laboratories either partnering with the NHS or providing testing capacity.

 


DHSC in consultation with other agencies including the NHS decided that the most effective and fastest way to involve laboratories seeking to offer laboratory testing capacity was to ask them to form a partnership with a local NHS pathology network. To do so laboratories need to meet certain specifications. Guidance is available (link here) on the general specifications that a laboratory needs to be able to meet in order to form a local partnership with an NHS pathology network; and on the different partnership models that laboratories who meet those criteria could follow. An online portal (link here) was created to capture all such offers of support.

 

I hope this additional information is helpful to the Committee. Please let me know if I can help further.

 

June 2020