British Red Cross—Written Evidence (PMS0008)

 

About the British Red Cross

 

>       The British Red Cross (BRC) provides practical and emotional support to vulnerable refugees and asylum seekers in the UK, as a part of our humanitarian mandate, as one member of a global Red Cross Red Crescent movement.

>       We operate in 48 towns and cities across the whole of the United Kingdom working with asylum seekers and vulnerable migrants.

>       Every year we help around 10,000 asylum seekers and refugees, of which two thirds are destitute. We often find ourselves as the final port of call across the UK for desperate people in crisis seeking the basic essentials of life such as food and clothes.

>       We seek a world in which all those seeking sanctuary are able to do so with dignity and safely, and where no one is left destitute as a result.

1.             Executive Summary

1.1.      We are grateful that the committee is focussing on an issue of such humanitarian importance and are pleased to submit our views as to the priorities in this regard.

1.2.      Whilst we recognise that committee inquiry is toward the EU action plan, we feel, however that the proposals in the plan are woefully inadequate in addressing the situation.

1.3.      We advocate that the prioritisation should be on providing safe and legal routes into the EU for humanitarian protection, rather than on smuggling, which is the core emphasis of the plan.

1.4.      As such, this submission talks more to core issues and general humanitarian principles to which we urge EU member states, including the British Government, to work collectively to achieve. These include:

1.5.      The key recommendations outlined have been formulated in collaboration with our EU Red Cross office colleagues (Brussels) and jointly agreed by all EU member National Societies.

1.6.      The BRC will join with the International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) in  their new campaign entitled “Protect humanity – Stop indifference” (to be launched shortly in September) in order to re-emphasise these issues outlined below. We can provide the committee with further details in due course.

 

2.             General Principles

2.1.      In the past few years, the number of people embarking on dangerous journeys by sea, land and across borders to seek protection or better life opportunities has grown exponentially. Their journey has become more perilous greatly due to the migration policies and border control practices that limit their access to protection. With it, the risks faced by these people, as well as the episodes of xenophobia, discrimination, exclusion and violence have also grown. These contribute to increasing the vulnerability of people on the move, their families and, eventually, host communities.

2.2.      We renew our call on the 194 State Parties to the Geneva Conventions to ensure that people on the move fully enjoy Human Rights and protection as anyone else. Specifically, we ask them to:

 

3.             Key Recommendations

 

3.1.      Outlined below are the key

3.2.      Legal avenues

 

  1. Legal avenues to access international protection

 

 

 

 

More information: Legal Avenues to Access International Protection in the EU and Access to international protection in the EU for people fleeing Syria.

 

  1. Family Reunification

 

 

 

C. Resettlement

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.2 Vulnerabilities along the migratory trail

 

In October 2015, RCEU will publish a new position paper on the vulnerabilities faced by migrants along the various migratory trails to the EU. Given the current context and pressing need for action, the paper will outline concrete steps for the EU and its Member States to take in order to reduce the risks and resulting vulnerabilities associated with these migrant journeys to the EU.

 

Recommendations will be along the lines of calling for developing mechanisms for identifying and addressing the additional vulnerabilities of migrants linked to the migratory trails; setting up dedicated search and rescue operations and supporting assistance to migrants in distress.

 

Likewise, once these key recommendations are finalised, we can update the committee should they be useful.

 

3 September 2015

 

4