Written evidence submitted by the General Medical Council (ELC0086)

 

 

 

1            We welcome the opportunity to provide evidence to the Health Committee Inquiry into end of life care.

 

2            Supporting improvements in end of life care has been high on our agenda since we published guidance for doctors working in this area in 2010. Most recently we have been a prominent member of the Leadership Alliance for the Care of Dying People (LACDP) which developed a collaborative system-wide response to the findings of the Neuberger Review of the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) and identified where improvements could be made to the care of dying people and their families.

 

3            In this submission we set out our statutory role, our involvement in the LACDP and the progress we have made against our commitments as part of this group.

 

Introduction

 

4            The GMC is an independent organisation that helps to protect patients and improve medical education and practice across the UK.

 

 

5            Every patient should receive a high standard of care. Our role is to help achieve that by working closely with doctors, their employers and patients, to make sure that the trust patients have in their doctors is fully justified.

 

6            Of particular relevance to this inquiry is the guidance we provide for doctors on Treatment and care towards the end of life: good practice in decision making. This builds upon the core professional standards expected of all doctors in Good medical practice, which covers the fundamental aspects of a doctor’s role, including working in partnership with patients and treating them with respect.

 

7            Our statutory role for medical education and training means that we also have an interest in the competence, capacity, skills and training of the workforce – areas which the Inquiry is examining.

 

Our involvement with the national focus on end of life care

 

8            The LCP was in use for over a decade. Its aim was to bring the best of terminal care to all clinical settings. If followed correctly and by properly trained staff, the LCP is consistent with our guidance and would help ensure that patients receive good care as they reach the end of life, and are treated with dignity and respect.

 

9            Though the LCP was introduced to help doctors and nurses provide quality care to patients in their final hours and days of life, over the last few years there were media reports that some patients had been put on this regime when it had not been appropriate for them. There was considerable concern among some relatives who felt that this framework had been misused and that they have been excluded from decision making about the nature of the care and support their loved one had received.

 

10       The subsequent Neuberger Review found that in some places the LCP had come to be regarded as a generic protocol and hence engendered a tick box approach. Care for dying people should not be based on protocols or tick boxes. A new approach was therefore needed that was about providing individualised care, focussing on the needs and wishes of dying people and their families. 

 

11       In July 2013 we joined the Leadership Alliance for the Care of Dying People (LACDP) to develop a collaborative system-wide response to the findings of the Neuberger Review of the Liverpool Care Pathway and identify where improvements could be made to the care of dying people and their families.

 

12       The system-wide response, One chance to get it right, identified a more intuitive approach to the care of dying people. Central to this approach are the five Priorities for care. These emphasise the need for personalised care plans and describe the high level outcomes that will ensure doctors and other professionals deliver the best possible care.

 

13       In addition to care plans, the Priorities focus on the importance of clear and sensitive communication with and about the dying person, and ensuring that the needs and wishes of the dying person and those closest to them are known and respected.     

 

14       The Priorities are supported by advice on the Duties and Responsibilities of Health and Care Staff implementing the Priorities in the different settings where they care for dying people. The Priorities for care and supporting advice for staff align with our good practice guidance, Treatment and care towards the end of life: good practice in decision-making, and with the standards and codes of other regulators including the Nursing and Midwifery Council.

 

15       We also helped the LACDP build a picture of the existing coverage of end of life care in the education standards, curricula and guidance which regulators, professional bodies and other institutions in the health and care sector have set. There is a summary of the findings in One chance to get it right. This work also helped identify opportunities for further developments in education and training and continuing professional development to better support and equip health and care staff in the care of dying people.

 

 

 

 

Our commitments and progress to date

 

16       One chance to get it right was accompanied by Commitment Statements, which set out a number of pledges by members of the LACDP on the action they will take to improve aspects of service delivery, professional practice and education and training to help embed the Priorities across health and social care.

 

17       The action that we are taking and the progress made to date is summarised as follows:

 

How we are promoting the importance of end of life care at local and national level

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our focus on education and training and continuing professional development

 

 

 

 

Monitoring progress

 

18       We hope the Committee find this summary helpful. We would of course be happy to provide further details of the action we are taking and the progress being made. 

 

19       We will continue to work closely with the Department of Health (England) and key interest organisations, both to monitor progress and explore opportunities that could strengthen education and preparedness of doctors in this important area of medicine.

 

 

18 December 2014