Professor Alison Andersonwritten evidence (FOJ0074)


Submission to the House of Lords Communications and Digital Committees inquiry into The future of journalism



About the author: Alison Anderson is Professor in the School of Law, Criminology & Government, Faculty of Arts, Humanities & Business, University of Plymouth, UK, and Adjunct Professor in the School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Australia. She is a founding member of the International Environmental Communication Association and former Editor-in-Chief of Environmental Communication.


Authors declaration: The views expressed in this paper represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the host institutions or funders.


Sustainable Earth Institute: The Sustainable Earth Institute was established in 2015 and brings together a diverse and distributed network of researchers working on sustainability- related themes across the University. Researchers come from a variety of research areas including media/journalism, arts, business, science, health and humanities.












Climate change communication and journalism


Climate change is one of the greatest challenges that we face in the 21st century and the news media play a central part in communicating the science. Journalists play a key role in framing the climate change issue (Anderson, 2014). Environmental stories often get more coverage in local compared to national media (Anderson, 2014; PIEC, 2014; Howarth & Anderson, 2019). Local media constitute an important source of knowledge for environmental issues, particularly among older age groups - with TV news being the most accessed offline source of news and one of the most trusted media sources (European Broadcasting Union, 2018; Newman et al., 2017; Reuters Digital News Report 2019; Shuckburgh et al. 2012). The journalists we interviewed in a recent study on local media reporting on climate change thought that regional outlets play an important watchdog role but that media are faced with issues around what one reporter described as a: disintegrating industry, collapse in advertising revenues, changes caused by digital publishing revolution, fewer journalists with less time, less pay, easily bored editors” (Howarth and Anderson, 2019).


Research suggests that Information on the local impacts of climate change is more effective at engaging audiences than national or global information (Holmes & Hall, 2019; Moser, 2018). Indeed, a survey into peoples attitudes to climate change following the 2013 UK floods found those affected were significantly more likely to be concerned about climate change than those that were not directly impacted (Capstick et al., 2015). When it comes to reporting on climate change, the provision of localised and up-to-date advice is crucial and helps communities to make effective decisions (Holmes and Hall, 2019).


A recent piece of research in the US tested different TV media reports on climate change and found that short localised reports on the issue enabled viewers to gain a better understanding of the local and personal relevance of climate change to them (Feygina et al., 2020).


Challenges and the threats to public interest journalism


The number of journalists on local news outlets has shrunk and reporters are often not based in the geographical community they are covering (Reuters Digital News Report, 2019). This has led to a significant decline in public interest reporting. Recent years have also seen the increasing emergence of hyperlocal journalism online ventures often run by citizen journalists that are geographically based and community oriented and tend to focus on neighbourhood issues such as the protection of a local green space (Williams et al., 2015).


However, such ventures are highly precarious.


The quality of reporting has suffered as it is increasingly spread across several different regions (Ramsay & Moore, 2016). There has been a significant decline in the numbers of people in the UK reading a local/regional printed newspaper each week (Reuters Digital News Report, 2019).



Appetite for news on climate change


Evidence suggests that there is considerable interest in climate change among the UK public. A recent YouGov poll commissioned in 2020 found that 40% of the public think that the media do not give enough space to climate change (Corner, 2020). Most of those between the ages of 18-24 (60%) believe that it does not gain sufficient attention. However, there is a widespread lack of trust in reporters who are much less trusted than scientists, television newsreaders and government agencies (Steentjes et al. (2020).


Recognising this issue, a number of initiatives across the globe have sought to build closer relationships between scientists and local media. The starting point is the recognition that local meteorologists are extremely well-placed in communicating climate science and information can be tailored in authoritative and visually appealing ways to particular regional segments of the audience.



Training initiatives


News stories that emphasize solutions increase engagement with the issues. In the USA the Climate Matters imitative (led by Edward Maibach at George Mason University) trains weathercasters and local reporters to cover climate impacts in “ways that are local, immediate and personal grounded in the latest science”. This has led to significantly improved reporting. . By 2016 over three hundred weathercasters at 202 TV stations across the US were taking part in the Climate Matters initiative.


Another very successful program is run by the Monash Climate Communication Research Hub at Monash University and also works with weathercasters to insert trusted and personally engaging information in local media outlets:


However, a survey of members of the Society of Environmental Journalists undertaken in Spring 2018 in the US found that despite the interest in professional development activities related to climate change reporting (e.g. learning about climate solutions and impacts, how to access credible sources of climate stories, and how to craft local climate stories), considerable barriers were impeding them from covering local climate change stories, including staffing cutbacks (Maibach, 2018; Maibach et al., 2018).



Conclusion and Recommendations


Engaging in processes of constructive dialogue between scientists and local media would lead to a number of benefit including better incorporation of the local context in science, greater understanding of how scientists and media work, better communication skills and trusted relationships between scientists, the media and public (Howarth and Black, 2015). However, greater resources need to be deployed to support the future of environmental journalism, which has particularly suffered at the local level. This could be through exploring charitable status options or tax relief for local news outlets. Some small-scale efforts have been made to improve training but much more remains to be done to support vital community models of news-gathering.





Anderson, A. (2014) Media, Environment and the Network Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave.


European Broadcasting Union (2018) Trust in Media.


Feygina, I., Myers, T., Placky, B., Sublette, S., Souza, T., Toohey-Morales, J. and Maibach, E. (2020) Localized climate reporting by TV weathercasters enhances public understanding of climate change as a local problem: Evidence from a randomized controlled experiment. American Meteorological Society,


Holmes, D. and Hall, S. (2019) A literature review of best practice communication of climate science and impacts: Guide for Policy Makers, Monash Climate Change Communication Research Hub, Melbourne.


Howarth, C. and Anderson, A. (2020) How scientists can work with local media to tell more engaging climate stories, PCAN Commentary, 28 February. scientists-can-work-local-media-tell-more-engaging-climate-stories


Howarth, C. and Anderson, A. (2019) Increasing Local Salience of Climate Change: The un- tapped impact of the media-science Interface. Environmental Communication, 13:6, 713-722


Howarth, C. and Black, R. (2015) Local science and media engagement on climate change. Nature Climate Change, 5 (6): 506508.


Maibach, E. (2018) Feature: Reducing the Obstacles to Science-based Local Climate Reporting, SEJ, March 21st.


Maibach, E., Craig, R.T., Yagatich, W.A., Murphy,J., Patzer, S.M. & Timm, K.F.M. (2018) Climate Matters in the Newsroom: Society of Environmental Journalists Member Survey, 2018.


Moser, S. (2018) Communicating Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience. In M. Nisbet, S. Ho, E. Markowitz, S. ONeill, M. Schäfer and J. Thaker (Eds.) The Oxford Encyclopedia of Climate Change Communication Vol. 2 (pp. 232-250). New York: Oxford University Press.



Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D., Nielsen, R. (2017) Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. Reuters Institute & University Oxford 017%20web_0.pdf


Project for Improved Environmental Coverage PIEC (2014) Environmental Coverage in Mainstream Media: We Need More. content/uploads/PIEC-Trends-Report.pdf


Ramsay, G. and Moore, M. (2016) Monopolizing Local News: Is there an emerging local democratic deficit in the UK due to the decline of local newspapers? London: KCL.


Reuters Digital News Report (2018) Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism


Reuters Digital News Report (2019) Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism


Shuckburgh, E., Robison, R., & Pidgeon, N. (2012) Climate science, the public and the news media: Summary findings of a survey and focus groups conducted in the UK in March 2011. Living With Environmental Change, Swindon, UK


Steentjes, K., Demski, C., Seabrook, A, Corner, A. and Pidgeon, N. (2020) British Public Perceptions of Climate Risk, Adaptation Options and Resilience (RESiL RISK): Topline findings of a GB survey conducted in October 2019. Cardiff University.


Williams, A., Harte, D.  & Turner, J. (2015) The Value of UK Hyperlocal Community News, Digital Journalism, 3:5, 680-703.



April 2020