Written evidence submitted by Mr Steven Cox [GRA1802]



About the Respondents

Steven Cox brings over 20 years of corporate executive leadership experience at one of the world’s largest technology companies, and an impressive record of impact and achievement through positive disruption and culture change. Latterly he was Fujitsu’s first Global Ambassador for Diversity and Inclusion. Prior to that he was Executive Director, Vice President, for Public Sector and Transport, Fujitsu UK. Steven contributes to Human Rights Watch’s global LGBT+ programme, as well as the anti-bullying UK charity Diversity Role Models.



Section 1

  1. Will the Government’s proposed changes meet its aim of making the process “kinder and more straight forward”?
  1. Should a fee for obtaining a Gender Recognition Certificate be removed or retained? Are there other financial burdens on applicants that could be removed or retained?
  1. Should the requirement for a diagnosis of gender dysphoria be removed?
  1. Should there be changes to the requirement for individuals to have lived in their acquired gender for at least two years?
  1. What is your view of the statutory declaration and should any changes have been made to it?
  1. Does the spousal consent provision in the Act need reforming? If so, how? If it needs reforming or removal, is anything else needed to protect any rights of the spouse or civil partner?
  1. Should the age limit at which people can apply for a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) be lowered?
  1. What impact will these proposed changes have on those people applying for a Gender Recognition Certificate, and on trans people more generally?
  1. What else should the Government have included in its proposals, if anything?
  1. Does the Scottish Government’s proposed Bill offer a more suitable alternative to reforming the Gender Recognition Act 2004? 

Section 2

  1. Why is the number of people applying for GRCs so low compared to the number of people identifying as transgender?
  1. Are there challenges in the way the Gender Recognition Act 2004 and the Equality Act 2010 interact? For example, in terms of the different language and terminology used across both pieces of legislation.
  1. Are the provisions in the Equality Act for the provision of single-sex and separate-sex spaces and facilities in some circumstances clear and useable for service providers and service users? If not, is reform or further guidance needed?
  1. What issues do trans people have in accessing support services, including health and social care services, domestic violence and sexual violence services?
  1. Are legal reforms needed to better support the rights of gender-fluid and non-binary people? If so, how?

November 2020





pg. 7