Written evidence submitted by Helen Clay-Chapman (RWS0046)

 

 

Written evidence to the Reforming Water Sector Inquiry

 

I listened with interest to the meeting on 6th January 2026 and wished to express my support for Marcus and his colleagues at DWI to achieve parity with the other regulators. Also to advocate for him in his quest to raise awareness and extend DWI’s powers in the areas he listed as warranting further attention.

 

As an experienced, now retired practitioner of 50 years standing, I joined the Water Industry immediately post transition to the Water Authority model in 1974. There was a great deal to do, even in those early days, to comply with the regulatory requirements. In the 1980's I was actively involved in the preparations for privatisation highlighting all the non-compliant water quality issues in my area of responsibility and which required funding by the new privatisation model. I was then responsible for ensuring the funding was wisely invested for those sites for which I was the manager. Following the first three quinquennium’s of investments and alongside my Water Industry colleagues, the quality of the drinking water was successively improved by implementing new and improved treatments and control measures to address years of ineffective funding from the LA regime. Alongside the investment in infrastructure, the capability of the workforce was enhanced to ensure a significant step change was embedded on how we operated the water supply system.

 

With the implementation of the World Health Drinking Water Safety Plan approach water quality has moved from a fixed point monitoring system to a risk based proactive mitigation regime.

 

These improvements were all enabled by the role of the DWI who held and continue to hold us all to account.

 

It is therefore with concern, that I see the deterioration in water quality and sufficiency issues for some Water Companies and try to make sense of the direction of travel from the 'Cunliffe’ report and the recommendations regarding drinking water. Having listened to the meeting and the queries raised by your committee, I feel hopeful that there is an independent voice to determine and address the gaps inherent in the Cunliffe Review. I would wholeheartedly support the DWI in reassessing the 21 point list referred to by the Chief Inspector.

From my perspective, I am specifically interested in the plight of the Private Water Supply Regulations and would advocate for DWI to have powers to regulate the Private Water Supply Regulations without haste. In particular, I am profoundly concerned about the application of the Private Water Supply Regulations by our Local Authority and have first-hand experience covering over 30 years of trying to ensure the residents in our valley receive a safe and sufficient water supply. It’s has not been easy, even with the extensive regulatory, operational and practical knowledge and experience my husband and I are able to draw upon. In the following sentences, I hope to summarise the situation we find ourselves and hence our deep concerns about the future:

I have shared the above in the hope that my concerns will receive attention and add weight to the DWI's mission to address all the areas not effectively addressed in the Cunliffe report. Ideally, I would like to see a way forward whereby those of us on Private Supplies may be able to rely on the fair and equal application of the current regulations. Where deficiencies are highlighted, these are addressed to provide real and tangible benefits of safe and sufficient water for today and the future for the 1 million residents in England and Wales who rely on a Private Water Supply. 

March 2026