RE: International Planned Parenthood Federation Submission to Call for Evidence: Future of UK aid and development assistance             

The International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) appreciates the opportunity to contribute evidence to the International Development Committee’s inquiry into the future of UK aid and development assistance.

As one of the world’s foremost Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) organisations, with a network of national Member Associations (MAs) in over 150 countries, and a long-standing partner of the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO), IPPF is uniquely placed to inform discussion about the UK’s continued funding for international affairs and global development.

RECOMMENDATIONS

This submission makes the following recommendations, in response to the key questions outlined within the committee’s Call for Evidence.

1 – Protect and Scale Up Funding for SRHR, Gender Equality, and LGBTQI+ Rights

The UK has long been recognised as a global leader in advancing gender equality and SRHR, in 2023 ranking among the top European donors for SRHR disbursements as a share of overall ODA[i]. These investments have supported core UK aid and foreign policy objectives, including sustainable development, global health security, gender equality, and inclusive economic growth, as reflected in the International Women and Girls Strategy 2023–2030 and the Global Health Framework 2023–2025.

Flagship initiatives such as the Women’s Integrated Sexual Health (WISH) programme (2018 - 2024) demonstrate the sustained impact of the UK’s investment in SRHR. Delivered by IPPF and partners, WISH enabled millions of women and girls in Africa and Asia to access contraception, reducing maternal and child mortality, preventing unintended pregnancies. The programme was also instrumental in strengthening national health systems through provider training, supply-chain improvements, and service delivery infrastructure[ii]. The successor programme, WISH-Dividend, builds on these gains aiming to enable an additional 7 million women and girls to choose if, when and how many children they have by supporting health system strengthening and sustainable, locally owned service delivery.

However, reductions to the UK aid budget, now at 0.3% of GNI, threaten these gains at a moment of escalating global need. Retrenchment in support for SRHR, gender and LGBTQI+ rights from traditional allies, such as the U.S. and European governments, is severely disrupting essential services and weakening health and social infrastructure at a global scale.

As the Guttmacher Institute reports, over 70% of international family planning funding is now at risk, 40% from the U.S. alone[iii]. Estimates show that a 50% reduction in SRHR funding would leave 5.5 million people without contraception, cause 1.9 million unintended pregnancies, and result in nearly 2,000 additional maternal deaths annually; a 70% reduction nearly doubles these losses[iv]. IPPF projects that over the next four years, approximately 8.6 million people will be denied SRHR services from our MAs due to the loss of U.S. funding. These impacts are being felt not only in service delivery, but within global supply chains, evidence systems and the ability of local actors to effectively advocate and defend the human rights of those most marginalised.

To meet the escalating global need, the UK should ringfence and scale up ODA investments in SRHR, gender equality, and LGBTQI+ rights, safeguarding progress in the most vulnerable sectors and ensuring lasting, measurable impact. Specifically, the UK should:

 

 

2Strengthen Integration Across the Humanitarian–Development Nexus to Safeguard SRHR and Build Resilience in the Changing Global Context

The UK’s approach to development and humanitarian assistance must evolve to meet the demands of an increasingly complex global landscape. Conflicts, climate disasters, and protracted crises increasingly intersect with long-term development challenges, disrupting national health systems and placing women, girls, and LGBTQI+ populations at heightened risk. Over 70% of women and girls in humanitarian settings experience sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV), often deliberately used as a weapon of war. Similarly, girls affected by conflict are 20% more likely to be forced into early marriage[v].

 

Frontline health workers are also under increasing threat. Between January 2024 - August 2025, WHO documented over 2,000 attacks on healthcare workers, across 21 countries, resulting in over 2,060 deaths[vi]. Similarly, the Safeguarding Health in Conflict Coalition recorded over 3,600 violent incidents targeting healthcare in conflict zones in 2024, including the killing of more than 900 health workers[vii]. These trends underscore the urgent need to protect frontline health workers, in line with International Humanitarian Law, to safeguard access to essential care.

 

Ensuring continuity of SRHR services within humanitarian settings requires prioritising these lifesaving interventions across the entire humanitarian-development nexus through preparedness interventions and initiatives such as the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP)[1] for SRH in crises. Local actors, especially women- and youth-led organisations, are critical throughout this cycle. Present before, during and after crises occur, these organisations are well-placed to reach the most marginalised populations, who are often underserved by national or international programming.

 

To ensure ODA remains responsive to a rapidly evolving global context, the UK should:

 

 

4 – Invest in Rights-Based Approaches to Counter Democratic Backsliding

When women, girls, and LGBTQI+ people can safely exercise their rights and participate fully in social, economic, and political life, societies are more stable, resilient, and prosperous. The UK’s International Women and Girls Strategy (2023–2030) recognises this, affirming that defending rights is central to building peaceful, inclusive societies.

Yet the global rise of authoritarian and ultra-conservative movements is actively undermining these objectives, weaponizing gender and sexuality to consolidate power, restrict bodily autonomy, and erode democratic norms. These attacks directly threaten UK national security and foreign policy priorities by destabilizing societies, undermining governance, and weakening resilience to conflict and extremism. Concerningly, transnational anti-rights networks are exerting growing influence in key national and global spaces, further challenging democratic institutions, civic space, and the protection of human rights.

To address these threats, the UK should adopt a proactive, evidence-driven approach that integrates human rights, governance, and peacebuilding across its aid and foreign policy:

 

5 – Champion Meaningful Multilateral Reform to Safeguard SRHR and Gender Equality

The multilateral order faces a legitimacy and effectiveness crisis. Across the UN system, anti-rights actors are increasingly shaping agendas, occupying strategic decision-making roles, and attempting to weaken commitments to SRHR, gender equality, and diversity, threatening the universality of human rights and undermining core UK foreign policy priorities on peacebuilding, conflict prevention, and global health.

These dynamics also have significant implications for the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda, as efforts to erode SRHR and gender equality commitments directly undermine women’s participation, protection, and leadership in peace and security processes. At the same time, structural reform proposals such as the UN80 initiative, including potential mergers of UNFPA, UN Women, and DESA, and the sunsetting of UNAIDS, risk diluting institutional mandates and weakening the global SRHR architecture if not carefully implemented. Together with a growing disconnect between multilateral policymaking and the lived realities of affected communities, these trends underscore the urgent need for more inclusive, accountable, and rights-based governance mechanisms.

As a permanent member of the UN Security Council, a major funder of multilateral institutions, and a historic leader in global health and gender equality, the UK has both the credibility and responsibility to help shape this reform agenda. The UK’s aid philosophy, centred on human rights, evidence-based policy, and locally led development, aligns naturally with a vision of a revitalised, accountable, and inclusive multilateral system.

The UK should use its diplomatic and financial influence to:

 


[1] The Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) is a set of priority, lifesaving sexual and reproductive health interventions designed to be implemented at the onset of humanitarian crises. It aims to prevent and respond to sexual violence, reduce maternal and newborn mortality, and ensure access to contraception and essential reproductive health services.


[i] Deutsche Stiftung Weltbevölkerung, Donors Delivering for SRHR Report 2024: Tracking OECD DAC Donor Funding for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights, Brussels, Belgium: Deutsche Stiftung Weltbevölkerung, 2024, https://donorsdelivering.report.

[ii] WISH Lot 1 Consortium, Sustainable Pathways to Reproductive Choice: How The WISH Programme Has Supported National Efforts To Improve Sexual And Reproductive Health And Rights In West and Central Africa, October 2023, http://www.msichoices.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/wish-report-sustainable-pathways-final-en.pdf

[iii] Guttmacher Institute, Clarity in Chaos: The Race to Preserve Funding for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights, October 2025: https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2025/10/clarity-chaos-race-preserve-funding-sexual-and-reproductive-health-and-rights

[iv] MSI Reproductive Choices, “UK Aid Cuts: New analysis shows why sexual and reproductive health must be protected”, 28 May 2025, https://www.msichoices.org/latest/uk-aid-cuts-new-analysis-shows-why-sexual-and-reproductive-health-must-be-protected/

[v] United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Global Humanitarian Overview 2021. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3977964?v=pdf

[vi] Global Health Cluster, “An urgent call to action from the Global Health Cluster,” 19 August 2025, World Health Organization, https://healthcluster.who.int/newsroom/news/item/19-08-2025-an-urgent-call-to-action-from-the-global-health-cluster

[vii] Physicians for Human Rights, “Attacks on Health Care in War Zones at AllTime High in 2024: Safeguarding Health in Conflict Coalition (SHCC),” 19 May 2025, https://phr.org/news/attacks-on-health-care-in-war-zones-at-all-time-high-in-2024-safeguarding-health-in-conflict-coalition-shcc/