Written evidence submitted by Headway (ASC0010)

 

Health and Social Care Select Committee Call for Evidence

Adult Social Care Reform: The Cost of Inaction

Response from Headway – the brain injury association,

 

 

Headway – the brain injury association welcomes the opportunity to respond to the current Health and Social Care Select Committee inquiry. Our response focuses on:

 

  1. About Headway – the brain injury association:

Headway is the UK-wide charity that works to improve life after brain injury by providing vital support and information services, including:

 

 

 

 

  1. Where in the system is the cost of inaction on adult social care reform being borne the most? 

From Headway’s perspective, the cost of inaction is being borne at community level, by the local Headway charities commissioned by adult social care to provide services, and by the individuals who are meant to receive this support.

Many more local Headway charities are now facing bleak financial circumstances for the following reasons:

To protect brain injury survivors, who are among society's most vulnerable members, Headway has repeatedly urged the Government to provide urgent, targeted financial support for local brain injury charities. Spending on local specialist brain injury services is a preventative measure – not doing so will result in far greater costs to the public purse.

 

Headway is currently carrying out a survey across the Headway Network regarding the impacts of delayed payments and delayed assessments on both local Headway charities and on brain injury survivors. They survey will close in January 2025, but the responses we have received so far help to evidence the issues we raise in this inquiry response.

 

Here are some of the responses regarding the impact on local Headway charities of delayed payments from adult social care services:

 

We run at a deficit most months due to the delays in funding. We are at a point where if these continue, we will have to close the service and the support we offer to 50+ individuals will be signposted back to the council, which ironically will cost the local authority more money than just paying our service directly.

 

We are currently in a financial position of loss.

 

And further responses regarding the percentage of the contracted service that local authority payments cover:

 

There are several different levels of funding for day services depending on level of need so can be different for each service user, however we did calculate the average across all service users and worked out that the LA/ICB funding covers 60% of the cost of providing the service.

 

This is LA dependent. In one LA the rate paid to us is two-thirds of cost. However, we are the lowest charging provider in the area charging approximately 40-50% less than other providers (half what others charge and these are not specialist).

 

 

And further responses regarding the sustainability of local Headway charities:

 

If we continue to have client hours reduced or lose client hours due to their contributions increasing and continue to wait 6 months or more for new clients to be assessed and receive funding it could be very difficult to continue to support local services with offering care for individuals with ABI. We may have to consider moving over to private individuals only and changing our business model.

 

Until LA's/ICB's start understanding that they need to pay more we won't be sustainable. They also need to realise that if we are very small charities, we do not have the "economies of scale" available to large profit-making organisations, or the staff time available to chase/update/perform the admin. It's also true that as a small charity provider we cannot compete when opportunities are put out to tender.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. What is the cost of inaction to individuals?

Local Headway charities have told us about the impacts of Headway closures on brain injury survivors and their loved ones:

 

Here are some survey responses regarding the impact on brain injury survivors of delays in assessments from adult social care services:

 

They often lose the motivation that has spurred them to act and contact us in the first place, the wait of over 6 months on occasion can be disastrous, leading to unhelpful coping mechanisms being used by the service user to cope in the interim (inc. substance misuse), mental health breakdown, carer breakdown, family relationships strained/breaking, exclusion from services due to their behaviours being misunderstood (without an advocate to help) etc.

 

Long assessment periods will ultimately lead to individuals relying more on NHS and authority services, potentially opening up the way to poorer health, falls, hospital admissions and social work allocation which could be avoided if the Headway branches are utilised and prioritised in funding expectations.

 

Isolation and loneliness, deterioration mentally, cognitively, emotionally and physically family break downs and issues.

 

Reduced health outcomes, impact on mental health, isolation, lack of access to support and networks, poorer cognition, deterioration in mobility and physical health, previous progress regression.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Delays in assessments for Headway services after brain injury cause brain injury survivors and their families numerous physical and mental health problems, which lead them to rely much more heavily on local state services.

Issues that existing Headway clients are facing on reassessment:

Further survey responses evidencing these issues:

 

All of our social care funded clients have been allocated for a review this year regardless of length of contract. Long term clients have been targeted for reductions on service and have had hours cut or funding reduced (so they pay more contributions towards their care). Some clients have been told they will now have Reaching for Independence services for 12 weeks instead to work them towards no longer needing permanent enabling contracts.

 

Clients struggle to understand why long-term support has been reduced when their issues have not changed. Social Services assume individuals with long term conditions can get better with the right therapies and support - this is not the case with many individuals with brain injuries who cannot process and retain information - meaning short therapy programmes like Reaching for Independence offer no solutions for them and leave them without critical support after their end, causing decline in health and wellbeing.

 

Awaiting reviews due to cost of fee increase for up to 12 months, when cost not need has changed. Financial difficulties, no allocation of social worker, long waits of up to 12 months. Some have stopped attending due to having to make a greater contribution. We also have clients paying for themselves whilst waiting an assessment. Lack of handover from ICB to LA's for funding/ assessment/ reviews.

 

We're seeing those who receive funded transport to the day centre from adult social care having their transport withdrawn while their attendance remains as it was. This then means that they cannot access the day centre because they cannot travel alone/use public transport and their PIP mobility element won't cover the costs of weekly taxis to the centre plus all of their other mobility related needs within any month.

 

 

Further responses regarding the impact of these reassessment issues on brain injury survivors:

 

Suicidal ideations, especially when they receive backdated invoices.

 

The main concern is mental well-being, the stress and impact of the assessments is huge, it is a long process with many forms and written text that is not always summarised or streamlined, added with miscommunication or lack of, particularly by local authorities in our situation can then lead to a 'surprise bill' asking the client to contribute. The huge turnover in social workers does impact the length of time but also has a negative effect on individuals who are unclear about who to speak or go to with questions or queries. Additionally, the lack of education within the social work team regarding brain injury is surprising, many are unaware of communication or cognitive deficits and book in for hour long meetings, unaware of the effects of fatigue.

 

Extreme worry before the assessment as they all expect to lose their funding/support to attend, if they do lose funding they then panic, may try to self-fund their attendance which can then lead to financial distress for them. We often see those who have to stop using the service slip backwards in their recovery, experiencing worsening mental health, family strain, carer breakdown and the use of unhelpful coping mechanisms.

 

 

  1. How might people’s lives change with action on adult social care reform?  

Headway’s 2024 Election Manifesto details our five most urgent calls to action, two of which are explained below: 

Reform social care: make social care equitable and sustainable

Despite repeated government promises of reform, the social care system continues to let down brain injury survivors. This persistent issue is characterised by chronic underfunding and inadequate staffing levels. 

Good social care is crucial for brain injury survivors to maintain independence and have choice and control over their lives. They deserve support from professionals specifically trained to understand their unique needs and challenges.

A recent King’s Fund report demonstrated:

According to the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services 2023 Autumn Survey, 470,000 people are waiting for care, direct payments, or assessment of their care needs.

Effective social care for brain injury survivors can facilitate social connections, sustained employment, improved mental health, and overall life satisfaction despite significant challenges.

However, the current system falls short for the treatment of neurological conditions like brain injuries. A 2022 survey revealed that only 23% of adults with neurological conditions feel their social care meets their needs and over half reported feeling excluded from decisions about their care.

Recommendations:

 

Family care: enhance support for brain injury survivors’ loved ones

Brain injury affects the whole family. Enhanced support for caregivers is crucial. A holistic approach addressing the needs of both the family and the survivor leads to better outcomes for all.

Families who receive appropriate support to understand and manage the effects of brain injury are more likely to stay together in the long term. Preventing family breakdown is crucial for the well-being of all family members and can lead to significant long-term savings in public resources.

Involving families in the patient's rehabilitation from the acute phase and providing them with personalised, high-quality information throughout the care pathway is essential. Brain injury can lead to personality changes, difficulties with anger and emotion regulation, lack of empathy, and apathy, all of which can strain family relationships.

For many families, the cost and time involved in travelling long distances to specialist neurorehabilitation settings makes visiting prohibitive and sometimes impossible. Headway understands this and provides grants to families in the immediate aftermath of brain injury.

During the post-acute phase, carers of individuals with brain injury often struggle to obtain sufficient support from local authorities. This lack of support can lead to long-term mental and physical health issues for the carers and contribute to family breakdown. In some cases, this can result in brain injury survivors needing care in specialised facilities funded by the state.

Many carers of brain injury survivors are forced to leave their careers to take on full-time caregiving responsibilities, often without adequate support or understanding from statutory services. There is an urgent need for greater support to address these challenges and prevent further strain on families and public resources.

Headway’s recent survey demonstrated the impact of brain injury on those who care for survivors:

These figures demonstrate the need for improved support and awareness for carers of individuals with brain injury, including better access to assessments, mental health services, and financial assistance. Addressing these challenges is essential to safeguarding the well-being of carers and enhancing the overall quality of care for brain injury survivors.

Recommendations:

 

 

December 2024


[1] Headway Salisbury and South Wiltshire, Headway Coventry and Warwickshire, Headway Cambridgeshire, Headway North London (merged with another group).

[2] Headway Northampton, Headway South East London and North West Kent, Fife Headway.

[3] Headway Ennisrone, Headway Isle of Wight (please note Headway Southampton and West Wessex have begun providing support there), Headway Carmarthenshire. Headway Bridgend will close formally in April 25.