World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) CAP0040
EAC: Inquiry on the role of natural capital in the green economy
Response from World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)
The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) is a leading, independent environmental organisation with representation in nearly 100 countries globally. Our work spans a number of key environmental areas, such as climate, food, forests, oceans, water and wildlife. This response has been prepared through the collaboration of the WWF-UK Economics Unit, Finance Policy team, Conservation Programme, and Public Affairs team. Combined, these teams have expertise on nature markets, financial regulation and policy, net zero transitions, economic growth, and green financial mechanisms.
As a civil society organisation working on nature positive transitions, financial policy and regulation, and nature conservation we welcome the Inquiry on the role of natural capital in the green economy, recognising the urgent need to increase private financial flows into nature. In this response we highlight specific policy interventions and tools that will enable businesses and financial institutions to align their investments with national and international environmental targets.
Inquiry: The Environmental Audit Committee is undertaking an inquiry into the current and potential future role of natural capital in the green economy, and the Government’s proposals to increase private investment in measures to support nature recovery.
Consultation: As part of this new inquiry, the Committee:
The Committee invites written submissions addressing any or all of the issues raised in the following terms of reference, by 17:00 on Friday 22nd September 2023.
Summary of key points:
To achieve the targets of the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF)[i], the UK needs to halt and reverse biodiversity loss, a concept referred to as nature positive. The targets of the GBF should be guiding the UK government’s nature recovery ambition and efforts. The current apex target of the Environment Act to halt the loss of nature by 2030 does not meet the level of ambition in the GBF. Private capital investment is necessary for two reasons:
To increase investment flows into nature: Becoming nature positive and achieving global nature goals as agreed at the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Conference of Parties 15 (COP15) will require financing. Public finance is critical, but alone is insufficient for the scale of the task. Private finance has the resource and potential to support these nature goals – by both shifting finance away from harmful activities and directing it towards nature positive ones – especially if they are considered alongside, rather than separate to, climate goals. It should be possible to create the incentives to unlock private financing for nature: as has been pointed out by multiple experts “natural capital underpins all economic activities and human well-being.”[ii],[iii] Additionally, the transition to nature-positive business models is estimated to generate opportunities worth US $10.1 trillion in annual business value and could create 395 million jobs by 2030.[iv]
To enable the private finance sector to support these global goals, a set of policy frameworks and tools at an international and national level are needed, which set clear direction for a nature positive and net zero economic transition, create the right incentives, and make it possible for the private sector to measure and report on nature impacts. Such foundational “building blocks” strengthen national level fiscal and regulatory action and play a critical role in allowing the financial sector to develop appropriate investment strategies, find profitable opportunities, and overcome risks – with respect to climate and nature financing.
Nature and biodiversity credit markets, such as Biodiversity Net Gain in the UK, are an important lever for increasing finance for nature recovery and local communities at the forefront of the transition, such as farmers. However, nature and credit markets can only address a small proportion of the impacts that businesses have on nature. The remaining vast majority of impacts occurs elsewhere in the supply chain, either downstream or upstream, beyond a business’ direct sphere of influence.[v] To mitigate these impacts, economic sectors need to transition to a nature positive business model.
To finance nature positive (nature recovery) transitions: The current economic system relies on the depletion of natural capital and on impacting nature negatively by releasing pollutants, using land and sea, and contributing to climate change. To reduce the impacts that UK economic sectors have on nature, to the extent needed to achieve the GBF targets, a whole-economy transformation is needed. This transformation requires development and deployment of new technologies, re-design of existing value chains, creation of new metrics for measuring economic success, and disruption of the dominant business models as well as of production and consumption patterns.[vi] Private capital investment is needed to finance the transition of the UK economy into a nature positive future. The UK government needs to provide an enabling environment, which will drive private capital investment towards this transformation.
Currently there is a lack of clarity on how businesses and financial institutions can align their activities and investment with environmental targets set by the government. For instance, the Government has set targets for reducing pollution and increasing nature restoration in its Environment Improvement Plan, but it is unknown how each sector of the economy can and should contribute towards these targets.
However, the UK Government has made meaningful progress on tackling climate change and implementing the Net Zero agenda, which should be replicated in the policy framework for nature. Governments have a range of domestic policy instruments at their disposal – particularly regulatory reform and fiscal policy reform – to align private finance with net zero and nature positive goals. Here we explore the two main tools which can align private investment with environmental benefits:
Nature Positive Pathways: In 2020, the Climate Change Committee (CCC) published the UK’s Path to Net Zero along the Sixth Carbon Budget, which outline the transitions that different sectors of the economy need to undergo to meet the Net Zero target by 2050. These pathways have been fundamental to guiding and accelerating action on climate change by government, business, and society, but no such pathways exist to halt and reverse the loss of nature.
We recommend the UK government to develop nature positive pathways across all key sectors of the economy, integrated with existing net zero sectoral pathways as set out by the CCC. This will give the private sector clarity on the national direction of travel on key issues, a critical condition for enabling business and industry to support the delivery of these two interlinked environmental goals. By presenting the transitions that economic sectors need to undergo to meet targets of the GBF, nature positive pathways should also identify the areas where the current policy framework falls short of the ambition of the GBF and offer policy recommendations. Effective nature positive sectoral pathways should be guided by the following set of principles:
Nature Positive Sectoral Pathways, which are integrated into the existing Net Zero pathways, will align private investment with environmental targets by:
Nature in transition plans: The Transition Plan Taskforce, set up with the HM Treasury in 2022, aims to establish best practice for firm-level transition plans and develop guidance for disclosures. Transition plans are timebound, comprehensive action plans that describe how a company intends to reduce its carbon emissions and climate risks in line with national and international targets, like those of the Paris Agreement. The disclosure of transition plans can enable real-economy firms to plan their operations and support markets in monitoring progress.
To date, the focus of transition plans has largely been on climate change – where businesses and financial institutions demonstrate how they will manage climate risks and take action to reach their climate targets. Best practice guidance for transition plans is emerging at pace, with growing agreement on the need to adopt a holistic approach: incorporating nature, adaptation, and a just transition. Given the significant interdependencies between nature loss and climate, it makes both scientific and business sense for companies to take an integrated approach to transition planning. And businesses are already looking to move beyond a sole focus on climate, towards more nature positive activities.
Nature loss and climate change are deeply interlinked: one cannot be prevented without managing the other. Therefore, we need to integrate nature in transition plans, both to deliver net zero and nature positive outcomes for the corporate and financial sector, thereby aligning transition plans with nature positive goals of the GBF. Without nature being put on a par with climate in corporate transition planning, there is a risk that corporates and financial institutions will not think about the climate and nature transitions together and in an integrated fashion.
A clear roadmap for the measures necessary to establish and maintain high-integrity markets was set out in the Financing Nature Recovery UK report in 2022. These measures mostly coalesced around the need for improved data, accreditation, and standards to increase confidence in nature markets. We strongly support the work being undertaken by the BSI to achieve this.
However, there is still a perception that investment in nature-based solutions and related markets is high-risk. Financing Nature Recovery UK noted that "the lack of an institutional architecture and robust market governance including approved standards for measuring and accrediting nature-based projects, means that investors do not have sufficient certainty to price and manage risk over the long term”.
WWF is involved in several projects that are looking to improve the underpinning evidence of emerging nature markets including the creation of a saltmarsh carbon code and piloting Nature-based Solutions for the improvement of water resources in Norfolk. Expansion and continued investment in the Natural Environment Investment Readiness Fund by government will continue to provide the resources and impetus needed to grow confidence in nature markets as well as the mechanisms needed to properly apply them.
In August, the governments attempted reform of nutrient neutrality rules contributed to a decline in investor confidence in nature markets. There was already a large body of work underway towards the creation of a nutrient credit market in effected geographies which would have enabled the flow of capital from the private sector into nature recovery, this is now under threat if the amendments are adopted by government. We need to see consistency in the regulation underpinning emerging markets if we are to continue to grow investor confidence and realise the scale of delivery necessary to bend the curve on nature loss.
At COP26, hosted by the UK in Glasgow, the then UK Chancellor, Rishi Sunak, announced that the UK will be the world’s first net zero financial centre. The UK finance sector holds a very prominent position in global markets and the standards that are adopted domestically in the UK influence international markets. The UK is currently a global leader in transition planning on climate and it can lead by example and set a standard for other jurisdictions to follow. The UK’s leadership should extend to incorporating nature-related goals into climate transition plans and develop supportive policy and regulatory frameworks at pace.
The UK also plays an important role in key international institutions and decision-making processes, notably as a member of the G7 and G20 and at UNFCCC and CBD summits. For example, as well as its key role at COP26 holding the COP presidency, the UK was also a key player in decision-making processes at the UN biodiversity conference, CBD COP15, in December 2022, playing an important leadership role internationally to help deliver a promising GBF. Several of the targets of the Framework relate to mobilising private finance and influencing financial flows to prevent the further loss of biodiversity around the world.
September 2023
[i] Convention on Biological Diversity. (2022). Global Biodiversity Framework. https://www.cbd.int/gbf/targets/
[ii] OECD (2021) Biodiversity, Natural Capital and the Economy: A Policy Guide for Finance, Economic and Environment Ministers. https://www.oecd.org/environment/biodiversity-natural-capital-and-the-economy-1a1ae114-en.htm
[iii] IPBES (2019) The global assessment report on: Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Compact.https://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/inline/files/ipbes_global_assessment_report_summary_for_policymakers.pdf
[iv] World Economic Forum (2020) The Future of Nature and Business. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Future_Of_Nature_And_Business_2020.pdf
[v] Bull, JW., et al. (2022). Analysis: the biodiversity footprint of the University of Oxford. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-01034-1
[vi] World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future Of Nature And Business.