Written Evidence submitted by TIPA UK (SH0057)
Contents
The Value Proposition of Compostable Packaging
1) The Environment Improvement Plan (EIP) 2023 (published 31st January 2023[1])
2) The Government’s response to the EFRA Select Committees’ enquiry on Plastic Waste (published 27 January 2023)[2]
On the improvement of UK soil health
On the reduction of plastic waste to reduce microplastic soil contamination
On the reduction of food waste
Challenge One: The degradation of topsoil across the UK presents a long-term, significant threat to the stability and prosperity of the UK’s agricultural sector.
Challenge Two: The blight of conventional plastic waste continues to create major environmental repercussions which must be addressed globally, including the systemic issues which microplastics in soil present for the agricultural sector.
Challenge Three: The incorrect disposal of organic and food wastes to landfill or energy recovery centres leads to the unnecessary release of GHG emissions and presents a missed opportunity to improve the nutrient content of our soil and offset topsoil degradation.
xvii. To answer the challenges listed above, compostable packaging can:
Increase the amount of food waste captured and collected for ‘organic recycling’/composting.
Reduce the amount of non-recyclable plastic created.
Assist the restoration of topsoil across the UK, by increasing the tonnage of nutrient rich compost
1.1. The Sustainable Soil Alliance commented that only 0.41% of the Environment Agency’s monitoring budget is spent on monitoring soil health and conditions, heightening the risk of soil degradation leading to increased flood risks, rising food instability and loss of biodiversity. According to the Environment Agency, of their total budget in 2017/2018, £60.5 million is spent on monitoring water quality, £7.65 million on air – but just £283,780 on soil.[44]
1.2. The Environment Agency themselves have admitted that there is ‘insufficient data on the health of our soils and investment is needed in soil monitoring’.[45] The Government Natural Capital Committee (NCC) report in October 2020 outlined there are simply no national statistics available and a “national survey is urgently needed to provide data on extent and condition of soils, including the establishment of a baseline assessment of soils against which change can be measured.”[46] Without this, it will be impossible for the Government to effectively measure progress towards its overall soil sustainability goals.
1.3. This lack of UK data also aligns with the Royal Society’s commentary that there is insufficient data to understand the impact issues such as microplastic contamination are really having on UK soils and the long-term effects they will cause.[47]
1.4. We therefore welcome the Government’s commitment in its Environment Improvement Plan to establish a soil health indicator under the 25 Year Environment Plan Outcome Indicator Framework.
1.5. We also welcome the Government’s commitment to publish a baseline map of soil health for England by 2028, and support farmers and land managers to establish their own soil health baseline.
1.6. In addition to these metrics, we would urge the Government to consider the inclusion of a test, in this baseline map, to study the presence of microplastics in soil. According to the NCC there are currently three organic toxins which should be studied in the measurement of soil health. The presence of a) Polychlorinated bipheneyls; b) total dioxins/furans concentration; and c) total PAH concentration. A metric to study toxic components to soil, such as the presence of microplastics, would further improve the measurement of soil health – especially given the adverse effect they are thought to have on organisms and ecosystems, underlined in the studies discussed above.
1.7. We would urge the Government to ensure that the establishment of a soil health indicator through the Natural Capital and Ecosystem Assessment (NCEA) Programme includes a measurement to calculate the presence of microplastics in the soil – due to the toxic impact they have on terrestrial ecosystems.
1.8. We would also propose that the Government can and should further study the important role which organic compost and digestate can play in the restoration of UK soils. Despite a small mention of the need to manage emissions of organic manures and from anaerobic digestion processes, the focus is on controlling the biomethane, and ammonia emissions produced, not the positive impact which digestate can have on the restoration of UK soils. Further to this, there is no mention of the important role organic compost can play in the document.
1.9. According to WRAP, the estimated grossed composting feedstock in England for 2018 was 5.1 million tonnes[48]. Improved accuracy of these figures over time will prove how much organic matter and much needed nutrient rich compost is re-entering UK soils, if a baseline for nutrient content per/tonne of compost is also known, as shown below by figure one from the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB).[49]
1.10. According to the agricultural industries confederation[50], the UK used in 2020/21, 1,014,000 tonnes of nitrogen, 171,000 tonnes of phosphate, 266,000 tonnes of potash and 238,000 tonnes of sulphur in inorganic, chemically based fertilisers. It is worth noting the manufacture of these nitrogen-based inorganic fertilisers creates significant greenhouse gas emissions – roughly 1-2% of total global GHG emissions
1.11. Based on the approximate tonnage listed by WRAP above, the AIC and ADHB figures, it can be calculated that current compost feedstocks create an estimated 56,100 tonnes of nitrogen (~5.5% of requirements), 24,990 tonnes of phosphate (~14% of requirements), 40,800 tonnes of potash (~15% of requirements), 26,010 tonnes of sulphur (~11% of requirements) and 17,340 tonnes of magnesium.
1.12. This shows the enormous role which organic compost feedstocks is already contributing to UK agriculture and shows the need for further expansion of the feedstock, to put UK agriculture on a more sustainable footing. A similar figure would also be calculable for the amount of nutrient-rich digestate also created in the UK annually through anaerobic digestion processes.
1.13. We therefore urge the Government to properly consider the role which compost can play in the restoration of soil health across the UK and detail how this can build towards the achievement of its target of at least 40% of England’s agricultural soils being sustainably managed by 2028, increased to 60% by 2030.
2.1 We agree with the UK Government’s transition away from untargeted direct payments to support land managers across the UK, to more targeted methods of payment which pay land managers directly for improving the environment, improving animal health and welfare, and reducing carbon emissions.
2.2 As reiterated in the Environment Improvement Plan, we particularly welcome steps taken to reward farmers and land managers for actions “that protect the soil from erosion, increase soil organic matter, and enable the plants and organisms that live in the soil to function effectively.”[51]
2.3 Yet, the Government refers to the “introduction of herbal leys and the use of grass-legume mixtures or cover crops” as an important method to helping to restore land, though fails to mention the important use of compost to help achieve this.
2.4 We also recognise that for farmers and land managers attempting to improve the standard of soil across the UK, the demand for nutrient-rich compost and digestate will likely increase. This adds further weight to our recommendation for the Government to properly consider the effective usage of compost in helping to restore UK soils, something omitted from the Environment Improvement Plan.
3.1 We note the change in the Government’s ambition as set out in the Environment Improvement Plan from past targets, that “By 2028 we will bring at least 40% of England’s agricultural soil into sustainable management through our new farming schemes, increasing this to up to 60% by 2030.”[52]
3.2 This is a noted shift from their past target that “England’s soils must be managed sustainably by 2030” suggesting the target was 100% of UK soils. Whilst we do not oppose DEFRA’s shift in target, if it believes the new target is realistic, it must take steps to ensure that targets do not continually slip, as has been the case with reductions to eliminate plastic waste – with the Ellen Macarthur Foundation recently concluded the Government will miss its plastic pact targets at its current pace.[53]
4.1 As stated in challenge three of the opening statement, the coalition believes that there is significant capacity for the Government to support the food and agriculture sector transition away from hard-to-recycle plastic waste towards more sustainable compostable alternatives, alongside improving the collection and utility of food waste - ultimately leading to better soil management and health – through increased yields of nutrient rich A-grade compost entering UK soils, without microplastics present.
4.2 The coalition believes that the incorrect disposal of 80% of organic and food wastes to landfill or energy recovery centres is a significant missed opportunity and leads to the unnecessary release of GHG emissions and presents a missed opportunity to improve the nutrient content of our soil and offset topsoil degradation.
4.3 Whilst these Government initiatives to reduce food waste are welcome, including the UK Food Waste Reduction Roadmap, the primary focus of many initiatives is on reducing the amount of food wastes generated at source – with less focus on ensuring food waste is collected and processed into a sustainable waste stream (organic composting and anaerobic digestion).
4.4 Building from this a study by the Italian Composting Consortium[54] found that food disposed of in compostable liners increases the speeds at which it is processed and composted. Minimising the need to use digesters to remove food waste from plastic items.
4.5 As shown by the Environment Improvement Plan’s failure to discuss organic recycling, the Government often overlooks the fact that significant existing industrial composting capacity exists in the UK at present. There are 406 facilities in the UK that comprise or include a composting process. 148 are certified by Renewable Energy Assurance Ltd.’s Compost Certification Scheme; producing quality compost products that meet End of Waste criteria (in most countries in the UK, this means the Compost Quality Protocol, PAS 100 and REAL’s CCS rules). Amongst these certified processors, 24 already accept independently certified compostable items; kitchen caddy/food bin liners, packaging, or both. These facilities are located within each of the home nations of the UK – 17 in England, 3 in Scotland, 3 in Northern Ireland and 1 in Wales.
Figure 2: Map of permit and licence-scale composting facilities in the UK
4.6 We would urge the Government to effectively invest in organic recycling and composting infrastructure across the UK, to grow the amount of high-quality, nutrient rich compost and digestate produced annually, which can directly help improve soil health across the country. We would recommend learnings are taken from Australia, where the Government has invested $67 million AUD in the country’s organic waste processing infrastructure, under the ‘Food Waste for Healthy Soils Fund.’
4.7 Further to this, whilst we welcome the Government’s plans to introduce food waste collections for all households by 2025 -as a vital step towards reducing the amount of food waste sent to landfill or burnt at energy recovery centres - the inability to collect compostable packaging alongside food waste in these collection schemes presents another missed opportunity to increase the amount of food waste collected for composting.
4.8 Further to the coalition’s trials on consumer behaviour, the coalition is also running trials with local authorities to test the effectiveness of collecting compostable packaging alongside food waste. At present 17% of local authorities in England collect compostable packaging via food waste bins, allowing consumers to dispose of their compostable waste in an efficient manner. This coverage could extend rapidly to build upon the 37% of English local authorities already collecting food waste. This is set to increase to 100% over the period from financial year 2024/25 to 2030/31, dependent on the speed of the rollout of mandatory separate collection of food waste.
4.9 We would urge the Government to allow the UKRI funded trials currently underway through the Compostable Coalition UK the time to report its evidence on the utility of compostable plastics, and their intrinsic value in the replacement of hard-to-recycle plastic waste. Thus, allowing the Government to make an informed choice on the use of compostables in the UK.
4.10 Finally, we would also urge the Government to ensure that they remain open for further discussions with the compostable plastic and packaging industry to discuss the effectiveness of collecting compostable packaging alongside food waste to improve the efficiency and quantity of food waste gathered, whilst reducing the likelihood of contamination by microplastics.
4.11 As stated by the Government in their response to the EFRA select committee’s enquiry on plastic waste, the Government proposes that collection of compostable plastics and packaging alongside food waste will not occur unless certain conditions are met, “including ensuring that the material being suitable for collection and recycling and ensuring that end markets exist for the material.”
5.1 Beyond incentivising the collection of food waste and investing in organic recycling infrastructure to increase the amount of organic matter and nutrient rich content available for UK soils, there remain further technical steps the UK Government can implement to reduce dependency on non-recyclable plastics, help eliminate unnecessary plastic waste and reduce the amount of microplastics in UK soils.
5.2 As stated above, Compostable Coalition members believe that the Government should look to promote, rather than hinder, the development of compostable plastics and packaging solutions, where they can provide readily available alternatives to non-recyclable plastic waste. This stems from our core belief that for every tonne of compostable packaging produced and composted effectively at the end of its life, providing value after the fact through nutrient-rich compost, there is a tonne of non-recyclable plastic waste not produced, creating the risk of microplastic contamination of our soil and oceans.
5.3 We believe that, far from being a niche product, compostable packaging has a range of utility, which is underlined by the growth of its usage across the UK, and the strong support it receives from the UK public.[55]
5.4 Collection of compostable packaging alongside food waste at the local authority level is not the only place where this can occur, with several private initiatives being set up to collect compostable packaging in a closed-loop environment – ensuring recapture of compostable plastic waste for correct disposal via composting. Coalition partners, such as Vegware, have a long-established collection programme in place which successfully collects and treats certified compostable packaging from various customers and numerous cafeterias and eating halls across London, as well as on behalf of brands such as Riverford Organic Farmers, Natoora, and Scotch and Soda. By 2023, we expect to collect 50k tonnes of compostable packaging.
5.5 We would urge the Government to acknowledge the utility of private of public initiatives which collect and organically recycle compostable plastics and packaging as part of closed loop systems. These systems can ensure compostable plastics are treated properly and composted to create nutrient rich, A-grade compost which can be used in the restoration of UK soils. We would ask the Government to reflect this utility in the modulated fee structures of the upcoming Extended Producer Responsibility Scheme.
5.6 We would also urge the Government to reconsider its current policies, such as the Extended Producer Responsibility Scheme, which are set to further hinder the development of the compostable plastic and packaging industry and reduce its ability to replace non-recyclable plastic waste.
5.7 While we welcome the overall objectives behind the Government’s EPR regulations and agree with the principle that producers of packaging should be responsible for covering the full net costs of collecting and treating waste packaging in ways that contribute to net zero targets, we disagree that compostable plastics are being treated as if they are as unsustainable as non-recyclable plastic waste.
5.8 If the Government remains committed to this policy, we urge the Government to commit any money raised from the EPR scheme from compostable packaging to be ring-fenced and support the development of compostables collection and treatment in organic recycling facilities – further aiding the expansion of the industry and allowing the greater use of compost and digestate to restore UK soils.
5.9 Italy can provide another source of learning for the UK Government, where money collected from the producers of compostable packaging through an Extended Producer Responsibility scheme is reinvested directly back into the organic recyclers and that handle the material at its end-of-life stage. This provides them approximately EUR 20 million per year, with further parts of the EPR scheme funds being used to educate the public about how they can correctly dispose of their compostable waste, alongside their food waste.
5.10 Finally, the Government must look beyond the food and retail sectors as a main creator of plastic waste and ensure the agriculture itself takes significant steps to reduce plastic waste. As outlined in the DEFRA strategy ‘Our Waste, Our Resources: A Strategy for England’ it notes that “Large amounts of plastic film are used by farmers, to protect their crops from bad weather and pests. Attempts to collect this material for recycling have often been unsuccessful,”[56] due to the contaminants present. Further plastic items used on farms include tree guards, clips for plants and trees, nets, irrigation systems etc. can often be left to nature – turning into hazardous plastic waste over extended periods of time.
5.11 As has been recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, we would urge the Government to look beyond the food and retail sectors as a main creator of plastic waste and ensure sectors, such as agriculture, are themselves taking significant steps to reduce plastic waste. Steps to address this should focus on ensuring that sustainable alternatives for plastic items are found where practical, such as the replacement of plastic mulch with compostable alternatives, and a mandatory EPR scheme is introduced on all companies supplying plastics to agriculture.[57]
February 2023
[1] HM Government, Environmental Improvement Plan 2023 (2023), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1133077/environmental-improvement-plan-2023.pdf, (accessed 31 January 2023)
[2] House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, The price of plastic: ending the toll of plastic waste: Government Response to the Committee’s Third Report (2023), https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/33720/documents/184245/default/, (accessed 31 January 2023)
[3] Ibid p.2
[4] House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, The price of plastic: ending the toll of plastic waste (2022), https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/31509/documents/176742/default/, p.36, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[5] WRAP, A Roadmap to 2025: The UK Plastics Pact [website], https://wrap.org.uk/resources/guide/roadmap-2025-uk-plastics-pact#:~:text=The%20UK%20Plastics%20Pact%20targets,alternative%20(reuse)%20delivery%20model.&text=30%25%20average%20recycled%20content%20across%20all%20plastic%20packaging, (accessed 19 January 2023)
[6] HM Government, Environmental Improvement Plan 2023 (2023), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1133077/environmental-improvement-plan-2023.pdf, p.103, (accessed 31 January 2023)
[7] International Solid Waste Association (2020) ‘Benefits of Compost and Anaerobic Digestate when applied to soil’ at https://www.altereko.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Report-2-Benefits-of-Compost-and-Anaerobic-Digestate.pdf, p.19, (accessed 03.02.2023
[8] TIPA’s commercial products on the UK market are certified as industrially compostable (with the TÜV Austria or Seedling certification schemes on the basis of BS EN 13432), or certified home compostable (with the TÜV Austria OK home compost scheme).
[9] All compostable packaging from partners in the coalition meets accepted compostable packaging standards. These standards are listed as BS EN 13432, BS EN 14995, ASTM D6400 and AIB-Vinçotte International S.A.’s ‘Program OK 2’ criteria for ‘home compostable’ packaging and plastics. This ensures that no toxic or microplastic materials are left behind after being correctly disposed of and composted. They are also permitted inputs for PAS 100 certified compost and the Compost Quality Protocol.
[10] Around 1.4 million tonnes of plastic packaging and over 50% of plastic packaging in the UK is not being recycled annually according to latest figures published by the Government: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/uk-waste-data/uk-statistics-on-waste#packaging-waste
[11] WRAP, A Roadmap to 2025: The UK Plastics Pact [website], https://wrap.org.uk/resources/guide/roadmap-2025-uk-plastics-pact#:~:text=The%20UK%20Plastics%20Pact%20targets,alternative%20(reuse)%20delivery%20model.&text=30%25%20average%20recycled%20content%20across%20all%20plastic%20packaging, (accessed 19 January 2023)
[12] Simon Christian, ‘The case for keeping co-mingled collections while boosting food waste recycling rates’, (2022), https://www.localgov.co.uk/The-case-for-keeping-co-mingled-collections-while-boosting-food-waste-recycling-rates/53830, (accessed 3 February 2023).
[13] “Without soil human life would be very difficult.” Soil provides plants with foothold for their roots and holds the necessary nutrients for plants to grow; it filters the rainwater and regulates the discharge of excess rainwater, preventing flooding; it is capable of storing large amounts of organic carbon; it buffers against pollutants, thus protecting groundwater quality; it provides humanity with some essential construction and manufacturing materials, we build our houses with bricks made from clay, we drink coffee from a cup that is essentially backed soil (clay); it also presents a record of past environmental conditions
ISRIC, Why are soils important? https://www.isric.org/discover/about-soils/why-are-soils-important, (accessed 19 January 2023)
[14] Environment Agency, ‘The state the environment: soil’, (2019), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/805926/State_of_the_environment_soil_report.pdf, (accessed 19 January 2023)
[15] DEFRA, ‘National Statistics Chapter 11: Environment’, (2022) https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/agriculture-in-the-united-kingdom-2021/chapter-11-environment#fn:footnote5, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[16] Springfield Agri, ‘Our Purpose’, (2021), https://springfieldagri.com/our-purpose/#issues, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[17] NFU, ‘The Foundation of Food- our vision for good soil health’, (2022), https://www.nfuonline.com/media/mibfsfsm/nfu-the-foundation-of-food.pdf, 2, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[18] Ibid.
[19] Louise Smith, ‘Plastic Waste’, House of Commons Library, (9 March 2022), https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-8515/CBP-8515.pdf, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[20] DEFRA, ‘Official Statistics UK statistics on waste’, (2022), https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/uk-waste-data/uk-statistics-on-waste#packaging-waste, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[21] Sarah George, ‘UK Government and industry launch nation’s biggest flexible plastic packaging recycling pilot for home’, Edie, (2022), https://www.edie.net/uk-government-and-industry-launch-nations-biggest-flexible-plastic-packaging-recycling-pilot-for-homes/, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[22] Condor Ferries, ‘Plastic in the Ocean: Statistics 2020-2021’, (2021), https://www.condorferries.co.uk/plastic-in-the-oceanstatistics#:~:text=Over%202%20million%20tonnes%20of,million%20tonnes%20of%20plastic%20annually, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[23] BBIA, ‘BBIA WEBINAR: Food Waste Collections in the UK', (2020), https://bbia.org.uk/bbia-webinar-food-waste-collections-in-the-uk/, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[24] Anderson Abel de Souza Machado et al, ‘Microplastics as an emerging threat to terrestrial ecosystems’, Global Change Biology, (2018), https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/02/180205125728.htm, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[25] Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, ‘Soil Pollution: a hidden reality’, (2018), https://www.fao.org/3/I9183EN/i9183en.pdf, 11, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[26] National Capital Committee, ‘Final Responses to the 25 Year Environment Plan Progress Report’, (2020), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/933803/ncc-final-response-25yr-env-plan.pdf, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[27] Anderson Abel de Souza Machado et al, ‘Microplastics as an emerging threat to terrestrial ecosystems’, Global Change Biology, (2018), https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/02/180205125728.htm, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[28] Bas Boots et al, ‘Effects of Microplastics in Soil Ecosystems: Above and Below Ground’, Environmental Science & Technology, (2019),https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b03304, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[29] Phoebe Weston, ‘Microplastics stunt growth of worms, study finds’, The Independent, (2019), https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/news/microplastics-worm-growth-ecosystems-pollution-study-a9100866.html, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[30] DEFRA, ‘How to do the actions in the arable and horticultural soils standard’, (2022), https://www.gov.uk/guidance/how-to-do-the-actions-in-the-arable-and-horticultural-soils-standard, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[31] Dunmei Lin et al, ‘Microplastics negatively affect soil fauna but stimulate microbial activity: insights from a field-based microplastic addition experiment’ (2020), https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2020.1268#d1e1563, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[32] Ibid.
[33] UN News, ‘Plastics in soil threaten food security, health, and environment: FAO’, (2021), https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/12/1107342, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[34] REA. ‘REA response to HM Treasury’s call for evidence on Tackling the plastic problem: using the tax system or charges to address single-use plastic waste, (2018), http://organicsrecycling.org.uk/uploads/article3429/Single_use_plastics_REA_evidence_30052018.pdf, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[35]Jane Gilbert et al, ‘Benefits of compost and anaerobic digestate when applied to soil’, ISWA, (2020), https://www.altereko.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Report-2-Benefits-of-Compost-and-Anaerobic-Digestate.pdf 4, (accessed 19 January 2023)
[36] AHDB, ‘Nutrient Management Guide RB209’, https://projectblue.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/Imported%20Publication%20Docs/RB209%202022/RB209_Section2_2022_220224_WEB.pdf.pdf, 32, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[37] House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, The price of plastic: ending the toll of plastic waste (2022), https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/31509/documents/176742/default/, p.36, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[38] Wendy Graham, ‘The Teabags without plastics in 2023 & those containing plastic’, (2023)https://moralfibres.co.uk/the-teabags-without-plastic/, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[39]Selena NBH, ‘Composting Tea (Leaves), https://www.carryoncomposting.com/142941471.html#:~:text=Tea%20leaves%20contain%20approximately%204.4,nutrients%20encouraging%20the%20decomposition%20process, (accessed 19 January 2023)
[40] Packaging News, ‘Waitrose launches home compostable tea bags for own label Duchy brand’, Packaging News, (2023), https://www.packagingnews.co.uk/news/waitrose-launches-home-compostable-tea-bags-for-own-label-duchy-brand-23-01-2023; https://www.tescoplc.com/news/2022/tesco-tea-bags-change/, (accessed 23 January 2023).
[41] Tesco, ‘It’s the great British teabag debate- how do you dispose of yours?’ (2023), https://www.tescoplc.com/news/2022/tesco-tea-bags-change/, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[42] Compostable Coalition UK will be conducting a trial to test consumer behaviours, by examining the impact of varied consumer interventions designed to educate and incentivise consumers to dispose of compostable packaging via three disposal/collection routes: 1) a take-pack program (via an online retailer) 2) a residential food waste bin 3) a food waste bin in a closed look arena (dining hall)
[43] Steve Farrell, ‘Compostable plastics have public support, finds survey’, The Grocer, (2022), https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/supermarkets/compostable-plastics-have-public-support-finds-survey/674066.article, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[44] Sustainable Soils Alliance, ‘EA response to FOI request NR115635,’ https://sustainablesoils.org/images/pdf/FOIdocx.pdf, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[45] Environment Agency, ‘The state the environment: soil’, (2019), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/805926/State_of_the_environment_soil_report.pdf, (accessed 19 January 2023)
[46] National Capital Committee, ‘Final Responses to the 25 Year Environment Plan Progress Report’, (2020), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/933803/ncc-final-response-25yr-env-plan.pdf, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[47] Dunmei Lin et al, ‘Microplastics negatively affect soil fauna but stimulate microbial activity: insights from a field-based microplastic addition experiment’ (2020), https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2020.1268#d1e1563, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[48] WRAP, ‘Anaerobic digestion and composting: latest industry survey report, new summaries of technology, and impacts’, https://wrap.org.uk/resources/report/anaerobic-digestion-and-composting-latest-industry-survey-report-new-summaries, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[49] AHDB, ‘Nutrient Management Guide RB209’, https://projectblue.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/Imported%20Publication%20Docs/RB209%202022/RB209_Section2_2022_220224_WEB.pdf.pdf, 31, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[50] AIC, ‘Fertiliser consumption in the UK (Annual Report), (2022), https://www.agindustries.org.uk/resource/fertiliser-consumption-in-the-uk.html, (accessed 19 January 2023).2
[51] HM Government, Environmental Improvement Plan 2023 (2023), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1133077/environmental-improvement-plan-2023.pdf, 180, (accessed 31 January 2023).
[52] Ibid.
[53] Ellen McArthur Foundation, ‘The Global Commitment 2022 Progress Report’, (2022), https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/global-commitment-2022/overview, 3, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[54] M. Centemero, CIC (Italian Composting Consortium), Webinar ‘CIC-Corepla 2019 - 2020 Study - Plastics and bioplastics in the organic recycling chain’, (7th July 2020), Optimization of organic waste recycling, Summary of the results of the monitoring programmehttps://www.r-e-a.net/resources/plastics-and-bioplastics-in-italian-organics-recycling/, 29, (accessed 19 January 2023)
[55] Steve Farrell, ‘Compostable plastics have public support, finds survey’, The Grocer, (2022), https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/supermarkets/compostable-plastics-have-public-support-finds-survey/674066.article, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[56] HM Government, ‘Our waste, our resources: a strategy for England’, (2018), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/765914/resources-waste-strategy-dec-2018.pdf, 106, (accessed 19 January 2023).
[57] Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, ‘Assessment of agricultural plastics and their sustainability: a call for action’, (2021), ix, https://www.fao.org/3/cb7856en/cb7856en.pdf, (accessed 19 January 2023).