Reforms required if Parliamentary scrutiny of treaties is to be effective, report finds

• Report: Working practices: one year on (HTML)
• Report: Working practices: one year on (PDF)

The report  

While improvements have been made to the system for parliamentary scrutiny of treaties over the last twelve months, much more needs to be done to ensure the system for scrutiny is robust and effective.  

In our second report on Working Practices, published today, we ask the Government to sign up to a Concordat to consolidate commitments made so far in relation to the parliamentary scrutiny of free trade agreements. The commitments made to date are welcome, but have been subject to frequent and iterative change. A Concordat would demonstrate that these are minimum requirements, that they are fixed and certain, and that they should be respected by this Government and any future administrations.   

We said that for scrutiny of trade agreements to be meaningful, it must not be a rubber stamp at the end of the process to convey simple approval. Instead, we should be consulted on a draft negotiating mandate, so that the process can be informed by Parliament, with dialogue continuing throughout the negotiations. 

We regret that progress on the scrutiny of non-trade agreements has been more limited. In too many instances over the last year, we were not made aware when such agreements were being finalised, and was only notified when they were formally laid in Parliament. This reduced our ability to seek expert input and report within the 21-day scrutiny window set by Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 (CRAG). We are therefore asking for a formal Ministerial undertaking that, in future, we will receive advance notice of all treaties. 

We have also put forward a series of further recommendations to help improve the scrutiny system, including on when amendments to treaties ought to be referred to us. Ultimately, however, we conclude that, even with the improvements called for in the report, CRAG 2010 is insufficient to facilitate real and meaningful scrutiny. We have therefore put forward three improvements that should be prioritised: (i) ensuring that Parliament has a formal role earlier in the process; (ii) that Parliament is provided with treaty text in advance of signature; (iii) that Parliament’s consent be required for all significant treaties, including trade agreements, which we have drawn to the special attention of the House. 

Chair’s comments 

Lord Goldsmith, Chair of the International Agreements Committee said: 

“We welcome the steps the Government has taken towards greater transparency of new trade agreements, including commitments to publish objectives ahead of the start of negotiations and to Parliamentary debates. But more needs to be done to make scrutiny robust. 

“As a first step, the Government should consolidate the commitments it has made on trade agreements in an iterative fashion over the last nine months in a Concordat to signal their importance. 

“A key issue of concern is that the formal points for committee engagement are always in response to a fait accompli: we may have parliamentary debates on negotiating objectives of trade agreements, but by then the mandate will already have been set; we can have advance sight of the text, but only after it has been signed and agreed. 

“Parliamentary scrutiny should not be a rubber stamp at the end of the process that conveys simple approval. For the system to function effectively, there must be meaningful consultation between the Government and Parliament. In particular, for agreements that have significant implications for the UK's domestic policy and regulatory framework, such as trade agreements, it is important that this consultation and dialogue takes place before a mandate is established, so the final mandate can be informed by Parliament, and continues throughout the negotiation process. This engagement with Parliament is a key part of engaging also with civil society and taking into account citizens’ rights and interests. 

“The International Agreements Committee will continue to work hard to emphasise the importance and benefits of parliamentary scrutiny to Government.”

Further information

• About Parliament: Select committees
• Visit Parliament: Watch committees