No Deal Brexit chaotic and damaging warns Committee
18 September 2018
Government's urgent priority must be to secure a Withdrawal Agreement, says the Brexit Committee report on the progress of negotiations with the European Union.
- Read the report conclusions and recommendations
- Read the full report: The progress of the UK's negotiations on EU withdrawal (June to September 2018)
Key points
- If EU opposition to Chequers customs and rule book proposals continues then Government's plans cannot remain as they are
- No Withdrawal Agreement possible without a workable backstop proposal for the Irish border
- Canada type deal would not on its own ensure friction-free trade or an open Irish border
Progress has been made but sticking points remain
As Parliament will need clarity on the shape of the future economic relationship through the Political Declaration, the Exiting the EU Committee says the priority must be to secure a Withdrawal Agreement. Whether the final deadline is the October European Council, or potentially mid November, the time remaining is extremely limited.
The Committee's report notes that there has been some progress on the draft Withdrawal Agreement - now said to be 80% complete - but emphasises that significant sticking points remain.
Irish border and a Facilitated Customs Agreement
Agreeing the terms of the ‘backstop' to prevent a hard border in Ireland remains the single biggest obstacle. The Government must set out clearly how it intends to eliminate regulatory checks at the border. Without an agreed backstop, there will be no Withdrawal Agreement and therefore no transition / implementation period.
The Report warns that given the EU's fundamental objections to the Government proposals on a common rulebook for goods and a Facilitated Customs Arrangement, if agreement cannot be reached on them then an alternative approach to the future EU-UK economic partnership will have to be found.
A 'no deal' outcome would have significant consequences for the UK and the European Union, warns the Report, which concludes it would be 'chaotic and damaging' for the UK economy, leaving many businesses facing huge uncertainty.
Chair's comment
The Chair of the Committee, Hilary Benn MP, commented:
"Time is now running out to secure a Withdrawal Agreement. Without one, there would be no transitional period and this would leave businesses and citizens facing great uncertainty in just seven months' time. There are, however, significant problems yet to be resolved.
The need for a backstop to keep open the border between Ireland and Northern Ireland was agreed last December by both sides and is therefore fundamental to any Withdrawal Agreement. The EU has now said it has no objection to a UK-wide backstop 'in principle' and this is to be welcomed. But the Government has not yet set out how it will maintain an open border without imposing customs and regulatory checks. It must now do so.
Time is also running out to agree the kind of detailed framework for the future relationship that Parliament will need to see. We're urging the Government to concentrate on getting a deal to ensure the continuation of tariff and friction free trade which is so important to the future of our economy. If the Chequers Plan is not acceptable as a basis for that, then the Government will need to find a different approach urgently. Alternatives are either an EU-UK Customs Union and alignment on relevant EU rules, or EEA membership and a customs union, but neither are Government policy."
Further information
Image: iStockphoto