Should the UK support decentralisation in a post-conflict Middle East?
20 January 2017
The International Relations Committee takes evidence from experts at Chatham House and the European Council of Foreign Relations on sub-state actors, decentralisation and the potential for new a US policy in the Middle East.
- Parliament TV: Transformation of power in the Middle East and implications for UK policy
- Inquiry: Transformation of power in the Middle East and implications for UK policy
- International Relations Committee
Wednesday 25 January, Committee Room 4, Palace of Westminster
- Hayder Al-Khoei, Visiting Fellow, Middle East and North Africa, European Council of Foreign Relations
- Haid Haid, Middle East and North Africa Programme, Chatham House
- The US, UN, UK and EU are currently absent from the Syrian peace process. Do you think this will continue to be the case?
- Does the UK have any political influence or leverage on the peace process or the future political arrangements for Syria?
- The spread of sub-state actors, supported by regional powers, across the region is increasingly challenging the writ of central states. How should the UK support Kurdish aspirations in Syria and Iraq?
- How would you advise the UK to approach the delicate balancing act of supporting Kurdish aspirations whilst managing the opposition of some regional states?
- How could the UK and other western powers assist the central government of Iraq with its process of decentralisation?
- In Syria and Iraq, is there scope for support of local actors?
- How can the UK government and western donors support pockets of good local governance?
- How would you speculate that US policy to Iraq and Syria might evolve under a new US president?
- While it may be impossible to talk to ISIL, how would you advise the UK to approach this question of talking to violent Islamic groups, who may – or may not – be proscribed?