Volkswagen failed UK customers, but Government is failing consumers
15 July 2016
The Transport Committee's report says the Government should investigate and consider prosecuting Volkswagen for its deception, but it has been far too slow to act.
- Read the report summary
- Read the report conclusions and recommendations
- Read the full report: Volkswagen emissions scandal and vehicle type approval
Volkswagen emissions scandal
Without proper sanctions against manufacturers that cheat, there is little to stop a similar scandal from happening again. The Report considers the implications of the VW scandal and makes proposals on how vehicle type approval should be reformed.
The Government has been complacent in identifying whether Volkswagen broke the law in Europe by installing defeat devices in its vehicles. The Department has tried to pass the buck to the European Commission which holds neither the evidence nor the powers to prosecute. The responsibility for prosecution lies with national governments.
Volkswagen refused to compensate owners of affected cars in Europe despite offering significant compensation to vehicle owners in the US. The Committee believes this is deeply unfair. The Committee has called upon the Department for Transport to ensure that consumers are not out of pocket in any way as a result of the emissions scandal or Volkswagen's fixes to affected vehicles.
On the Volkswagen scandal, Chair of the Transport Select Committee, Louise Ellman MP, said:
"Volkswagen Group has acted cynically to cheat emissions tests which exist solely to protect human health. Volkswagen's evidence to us was just not credible but the Government has lacked the will to hold VW accountable for its actions. There is a real danger that VW will be able to get away with cheating emissions tests in Europe if regulators do not act.
Vehicle owners have been refused goodwill payments. That is despite VW inflicting a great deal of uncertainty on its own customers along with the prospect of declining residual values and the inconvenience of having to undergo repairs.
We are concerned that VW's fix was developed at the lowest possible cost which might lead to increased costs for motorists down the line. We have called upon the Vehicle Certification Agency to do everything in its power to ensure that does not happen."
Vehicle type approval
The emissions scandal revealed significant flaws in the vehicle type approval system in Europe. The EU is now seeking to improve the regulations that set the rules for type approval but the Committee said that many of those reforms do not go far enough.
The Committee welcomed the planned introduction of 'real driving emissions tests' and a stricter lab test for measuring fuel consumption. It was disappointed that legal emissions limits were not set lower given the scientific evidence that shows dangerous NOx emissions could be cut much faster.
Commenting on the reforms, the Chair said:
"Many of the European type approval reforms will reduce the opportunities that manufacturers have to cheat emissions tests. That is to be welcomed.
But as vehicle technology becomes more advanced, what is most urgently needed is a robust regulator who can keep ahead of developments in technology. That regulator does not exist today. The VCA must make scrutinising manufacturers for non-compliance and questionable practices its first priority.
We are concerned that manufacturers have far too great a say over how type approval reforms are implemented. There is strong evidence that vehicle manufacturers have employed a wide range of practices that are, in effect, defeat devices by another name. We have called upon the Department for Transport to be transparent in how it works with manufacturers to prevent both the spirit and the letter of the law from being broken.
The vehicle testing and certification system is notoriously opaque. That has resulted in the VW emissions scandal. We have commended the Department for Transport on its commitment to spot check vehicles on the market. If that had been done properly in the past the likelihood of the emissions scandal from occurring in Europe would have been significantly reduced.
We have also called upon the Department to ensure future in-service surveillance is improved by combining it with a commitment to make its results and supporting data publicly available for additional independent scrutiny."