Skip to main content

Call for Evidence

Connected tech: smart or sinister?

Terms of reference

The DCMS Committee is inviting written evidence on the following questions by Thursday 23 June.

  • What has been or will be the most important impacts of increasingly prevalent smart and connected technology in our lives, including in the home, in the workplace and in our towns and cities, and are they necessarily better than current systems?
  • Are there any groups in society who may particularly benefit from or be vulnerable to the increasing prevalence of smart technology, such as young or elderly people, people with disabilities and people likely to be digitally excluded?
  • How can we incentivise or encourage design that is safe, secure, environmentally- and user-friendly and human rights compliant?
  • What are the key short- and long-term risks and threats, and how can we ensure the devices, systems and networks of individuals, businesses and organisations are digitally-literate and cyber secure?
  • How will current geopolitical concerns influence domestic consumers, e.g. regarding standards of imported goods or in how we can deal with cyber threats?
  • Do existing frameworks, like data protection legislation and the Public Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Bill, adequately address concerns with smart technology, and if not, how could they be changed?

This call for written evidence has now closed.

Go back to Connected tech: smart or sinister? Inquiry